Between profession and audience codes of conduct and transparency as quality instruments for off-and online journalism

Richard van der Wurff*, Klaus Schönbach

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

41 Scopus citations

Abstract

A three-wave Delphi study in the Netherlands invited 60 experts to assess the quality of online and traditional journalism and to propose measures for improvement. Although from very different backgrounds and representing a wide range of opinions, the experts agree on a focused set of core standards to be strictly observed by journalists. They separate these rules from other important norms about which journalists and their media may justifiably hold different views. And they identify transparency and a voluntary code of conduct as two crucial instruments to strengthen compliance with these norms. Summarizing the results of the Delphi panel, we propose a voluntary but binding code for journalism in the twenty-first century.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)407-422
Number of pages16
JournalJournalism Studies
Volume12
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Aug 2011

Funding

The authors would like to thank the Media Ombudsman Netherlands and The Netherlands Press Fund for commissioning and funding this study. We acknowledge

Keywords

  • Codes of conduct
  • Journalistic standards
  • Online news
  • Quality
  • Transparency

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Communication

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Between profession and audience codes of conduct and transparency as quality instruments for off-and online journalism'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this