TY - JOUR
T1 - Beyond The Basics
T2 - Preschool Children Label Objects Flexibly At Multiple Hierarchical Levels
AU - Waxman, Sandra R.
AU - Hatch, Thomas
N1 - Funding Information:
[*] This research was supported by a grant from the John D. and Catherine T. MacArthur Foundation and a Spencer Fellowship to S. Waxman. We are grateful to the teachers, parents and especially the children at the Cambridge Ellis School. We also thank Lauren Heim for assistance with data collection and analysis. Address for correspondence: Sandra R. Waxman, Department of Psychology, William James Hall, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA, 02138, USA.
PY - 1992/2
Y1 - 1992/2
N2 - Although preschoolers typically accept the basic level label for an object (e.g. dog) and tend to resist all others (e.g. collie, animal), this tendency is not inviolable. Under certain circumstances, children accept more than one label per object. In this experiment, with 20 three-and 20 four-year-old children, we extended this body of research in three ways. We examined (1) children's production of multiple, hierarchically related labels; (2) the pragmatic consequences of the inherent asymmetry of inclusion relations; and (3) the influence of morphology (modifier+noun constructions vs. simple lexemes) at the subordinate level. Children labelled objects most frequently at the basic level, but also readily produced many non-basic level terms. Children, like adults, may prefer to label objects at the basic level, but they exhibit no general prohibition against also labelling at other, non-basic levels. Their performance challenges the notion that the ability to label objects flexibly at multiple levels is beyond the young child's capacity.
AB - Although preschoolers typically accept the basic level label for an object (e.g. dog) and tend to resist all others (e.g. collie, animal), this tendency is not inviolable. Under certain circumstances, children accept more than one label per object. In this experiment, with 20 three-and 20 four-year-old children, we extended this body of research in three ways. We examined (1) children's production of multiple, hierarchically related labels; (2) the pragmatic consequences of the inherent asymmetry of inclusion relations; and (3) the influence of morphology (modifier+noun constructions vs. simple lexemes) at the subordinate level. Children labelled objects most frequently at the basic level, but also readily produced many non-basic level terms. Children, like adults, may prefer to label objects at the basic level, but they exhibit no general prohibition against also labelling at other, non-basic levels. Their performance challenges the notion that the ability to label objects flexibly at multiple levels is beyond the young child's capacity.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0026810667&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0026810667&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1017/S0305000900013672
DO - 10.1017/S0305000900013672
M3 - Article
C2 - 1551929
AN - SCOPUS:0026810667
VL - 19
SP - 153
EP - 166
JO - Journal of Child Language
JF - Journal of Child Language
SN - 0305-0009
IS - 1
ER -