Bits and pieces: The ethics of uterine morcellation

Kavita Shah Arora*, Monique Spillman, Magdy Milad

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

5 Scopus citations

Abstract

Intensive media and policy attention has been focused on the ongoing controversy surrounding uterine morcellation in gynecologic surgery. What has been missing from this impassioned discourse is an objective analysis of the ethical implications of uterine power morcellation in gynecologic surgery. This article discusses competing ethical duties of physicians, industry, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration, and the media to develop a more robust and nuanced understanding of informed consent for the use of morcellation in benign gynecologic surgery. Ultimately, as physicians, we must remain steadfast in our dedication to the use of evolving technologies to better patient health in a safe and ethical manner that is well-studied, informed, and implemented with appropriate training and precautions.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1199-1201
Number of pages3
JournalObstetrics and gynecology
Volume124
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 11 2014

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Obstetrics and Gynecology

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Bits and pieces: The ethics of uterine morcellation'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

  • Cite this