Blunt splenic injury in adults: Multi-institutional study of the Eastern Association for the Surgery of Trauma

Andrew B. Peitzman*, Brian Heil, Louis Rivera, Michael B. Federle, Brian G. Harbrecht, Keith D. Clancy, Martin Croce, Blaine L. Enderson, John A. Morris, David Shatz, J. Wayne Meredith, Juan B. Ochoa, Samir M. Fakhry, James G. Cushman, Joseph P. Minei, Mary McCarthy, Fred A. Luchette, Ricard Townsend, Glenn Tinkoff, Ernest F J BlockSteven Ross, Eric R. Frykberg, Richard M. Bell, Frank Davis, Leonard Weireter, Michael B. Shapiro, G. Patrick Kealey, Fred Rogers, Larry M. Jones, John B. Cone, C. Michael Dunham, Clyde E. McAuley

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

406 Scopus citations


Background: Nonoperative management of blunt injury to the spleen in adults has been applied with increasing frequency. However, the criteria for nonoperative management are controversial. The purpose of this multi-institutional study was to determine which factors predict successful observation of blunt splenic injury in adults. Methods: A total of 1,488 adults (>15 years of age) with blunt splenic injury from 27 trauma centers in 1997 were studied through the Multi-institutional Trials Committee of the Eastern Association for the Surgery of Trauma. Statistical analysis was performed with analysis of variance and extended χ2 test. Data are expressed as mean ± SD; a value of p < 0.05 was considered significant. Results: A total of 38.5% of patients went directly to the operating room (group I); 61.5% of patients were admitted with planned nonoperative management. Of the patients admitted with planned observation, 10.8% failed and required laparotomy; 82.1% of patients with an Injury Severity Score (ISS) < 15 and 46.6% of patients with ISS > 15 were successfully observed. Frequency of immediate operation correlated with American Association for the Surgery of Trauma (AAST) grades of splenic injury: I (23.9%), II (22.4%), III (38.1%), IV (73.7%), and V (94.9%) (p < 0.05). Of patients initially managed nonoperatively, the failure rate increased significantly by AAST grade of splenic injury: I (4.8%), II (9.5%), III (19.6%), IV (33.3%), and V (75.0%) (p < 0.05). A total of 60.9% of the patients failed nonoperative management within 24 hours of admission; 8% failed 9 days or later after injury. Laparotomy was ultimately performed in 19.9% of patients with small hemoperitoneum, 49.4 % of patients with moderate hemoperitoneum, and 72.6% of patients with large hemoperitoneum. Conclusion: In this multicenter study, 38.5 % of adults with blunt splenic injury went directly to laparotomy. Ultimately, 54.8% of patients were successfully managed nonoperatively; the failure rate of planned observation was 10.8%, with 60.9% of failures occurring in the first 24 hours. Successful nonoperative management was associated with higher blood pressure and hematocrit, and less severe injury based on ISS, Glasgow Coma Scale, grade of splenic injury, and quantity of hemoperitoneum.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)177-189
Number of pages13
JournalJournal of Trauma - Injury, Infection and Critical Care
Issue number2
StatePublished - 2000

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine
  • Surgery


Dive into the research topics of 'Blunt splenic injury in adults: Multi-institutional study of the Eastern Association for the Surgery of Trauma'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this