TY - JOUR
T1 - Brain-controlled muscle stimulation for the restoration of motor function
AU - Ethier, Christian
AU - Miller, Lee E.
N1 - Funding Information:
This work was supported in part by grant # NS053603 from the National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke to L.E. Miller and a post-doctoral fellowship from the Fonds de la Recherche en Santé du Québec (# 17436 ) to C. Ethier.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2014 Elsevier Inc.
PY - 2015/11/1
Y1 - 2015/11/1
N2 - Loss of the ability to move, as a consequence of spinal cord injury or neuromuscular disorder, has devastating consequences for the paralyzed individual, and great economic consequences for society. Functional electrical stimulation (FES) offers one means to restore some mobility to these individuals, improving not only their autonomy, but potentially their general health and well-being as well. FES uses electrical stimulation to cause the paralyzed muscles to contract. Existing clinical systems require the stimulation to be preprogrammed, with the patient typically using residual voluntary movement of another body part to trigger and control the patterned stimulation. The rapid development of neural interfacing in the past decade offers the promise of dramatically improved control for these patients, potentially allowing continuous control of FES through signals recorded from motor cortex, as the patient attempts to control the paralyzed body part. While application of these 'brain-machine interfaces' (BMIs) has undergone dramatic development for control of computer cursors and even robotic limbs, their use as an interface for FES has been much more limited. In this review, we consider both FES and BMI technologies and discuss the prospect for combining the two to provide important new options for paralyzed individuals.
AB - Loss of the ability to move, as a consequence of spinal cord injury or neuromuscular disorder, has devastating consequences for the paralyzed individual, and great economic consequences for society. Functional electrical stimulation (FES) offers one means to restore some mobility to these individuals, improving not only their autonomy, but potentially their general health and well-being as well. FES uses electrical stimulation to cause the paralyzed muscles to contract. Existing clinical systems require the stimulation to be preprogrammed, with the patient typically using residual voluntary movement of another body part to trigger and control the patterned stimulation. The rapid development of neural interfacing in the past decade offers the promise of dramatically improved control for these patients, potentially allowing continuous control of FES through signals recorded from motor cortex, as the patient attempts to control the paralyzed body part. While application of these 'brain-machine interfaces' (BMIs) has undergone dramatic development for control of computer cursors and even robotic limbs, their use as an interface for FES has been much more limited. In this review, we consider both FES and BMI technologies and discuss the prospect for combining the two to provide important new options for paralyzed individuals.
KW - Brain-machine interface
KW - Functional electrical stimulation
KW - Motor cortex
KW - Paralysis
KW - Spinal cord injury
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84948773411&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84948773411&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.nbd.2014.10.014
DO - 10.1016/j.nbd.2014.10.014
M3 - Review article
C2 - 25447224
AN - SCOPUS:84948773411
SN - 0969-9961
VL - 83
SP - 180
EP - 190
JO - Neurobiology of Disease
JF - Neurobiology of Disease
ER -