Brief review

The LMA Supreme supraglottic airway Article de synthèse court: Le dispositif supraglottique LMA Supreme

David T. Wong*, Jaisy J. Yang, Narasimhan Jagannathan

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

34 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Purpose This article is a review of the efficacy and safety of the Laryngeal Mask Airway (LMA) SupremeTM as a stand-alone supraglottic airway during general anesthesia and as a conduit for tracheal intubation. Relevant articles were obtained using MEDLINE (1948-July 2011) and EMBASE (1980-July 2011). Only original studies with adult human patients and published in English were selected. Principal findings The LMA Supreme was found to be comparable with the LMA Proseal TM with regard to success rate, insertion time, and complications. However, in three studies, oropharyngeal leak pressure was higher with the LMA Proseal than with the LMA Supreme. The LMA Supreme was superior to the LMA ClassicTM with regard to insertion time and oropharyngeal seal pressure. The LMA Supreme was also used successfully in two difficult airway cases, and it has been used as a conduit for tracheal intubation by utilizing an intubation introducer (gum elastic bougie) and subsequently railroading an endotracheal tube over the bougie into the trachea. Techniques for achieving tracheal intubation include the use of the Aintree Intubation Catheter®, a guidewire-exchange catheter, a gum elastic bougie, and a small (<6.0 mm internal diameter) endotracheal tube. Conclusion The LMA Supreme has been shown to be a safe and efficacious device as a stand-alone supraglottic airway and may also be used as a conduit for tracheal intubation. Further trials are needed to determine the efficacy of the LMA Supreme compared with other supraglottic airways in both elective and emergent airway management situations.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)483-493
Number of pages11
JournalCanadian Journal of Anesthesia
Volume59
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - May 1 2012

Fingerprint

Laryngeal Masks
Intubation
Gingiva
Catheters
Pressure
Airway Management
Trachea
MEDLINE
General Anesthesia
Safety

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine

Cite this

@article{833a4ca9f2e94dae9dcada31f2f7688a,
title = "Brief review: The LMA Supreme ™ supraglottic airway Article de synth{\`e}se court: Le dispositif supraglottique LMA Supreme ™",
abstract = "Purpose This article is a review of the efficacy and safety of the Laryngeal Mask Airway (LMA) SupremeTM as a stand-alone supraglottic airway during general anesthesia and as a conduit for tracheal intubation. Relevant articles were obtained using MEDLINE (1948-July 2011) and EMBASE (1980-July 2011). Only original studies with adult human patients and published in English were selected. Principal findings The LMA Supreme was found to be comparable with the LMA Proseal TM with regard to success rate, insertion time, and complications. However, in three studies, oropharyngeal leak pressure was higher with the LMA Proseal than with the LMA Supreme. The LMA Supreme was superior to the LMA ClassicTM with regard to insertion time and oropharyngeal seal pressure. The LMA Supreme was also used successfully in two difficult airway cases, and it has been used as a conduit for tracheal intubation by utilizing an intubation introducer (gum elastic bougie) and subsequently railroading an endotracheal tube over the bougie into the trachea. Techniques for achieving tracheal intubation include the use of the Aintree Intubation Catheter{\circledR}, a guidewire-exchange catheter, a gum elastic bougie, and a small (<6.0 mm internal diameter) endotracheal tube. Conclusion The LMA Supreme has been shown to be a safe and efficacious device as a stand-alone supraglottic airway and may also be used as a conduit for tracheal intubation. Further trials are needed to determine the efficacy of the LMA Supreme compared with other supraglottic airways in both elective and emergent airway management situations.",
author = "Wong, {David T.} and Yang, {Jaisy J.} and Narasimhan Jagannathan",
year = "2012",
month = "5",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1007/s12630-012-9673-0",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "59",
pages = "483--493",
journal = "Canadian Journal of Anaesthesia",
issn = "0832-610X",
publisher = "Canadian Anaesthetists Society",
number = "5",

}

Brief review : The LMA Supreme supraglottic airway Article de synthèse court: Le dispositif supraglottique LMA Supreme . / Wong, David T.; Yang, Jaisy J.; Jagannathan, Narasimhan.

In: Canadian Journal of Anesthesia, Vol. 59, No. 5, 01.05.2012, p. 483-493.

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

TY - JOUR

T1 - Brief review

T2 - The LMA Supreme ™ supraglottic airway Article de synthèse court: Le dispositif supraglottique LMA Supreme ™

AU - Wong, David T.

AU - Yang, Jaisy J.

AU - Jagannathan, Narasimhan

PY - 2012/5/1

Y1 - 2012/5/1

N2 - Purpose This article is a review of the efficacy and safety of the Laryngeal Mask Airway (LMA) SupremeTM as a stand-alone supraglottic airway during general anesthesia and as a conduit for tracheal intubation. Relevant articles were obtained using MEDLINE (1948-July 2011) and EMBASE (1980-July 2011). Only original studies with adult human patients and published in English were selected. Principal findings The LMA Supreme was found to be comparable with the LMA Proseal TM with regard to success rate, insertion time, and complications. However, in three studies, oropharyngeal leak pressure was higher with the LMA Proseal than with the LMA Supreme. The LMA Supreme was superior to the LMA ClassicTM with regard to insertion time and oropharyngeal seal pressure. The LMA Supreme was also used successfully in two difficult airway cases, and it has been used as a conduit for tracheal intubation by utilizing an intubation introducer (gum elastic bougie) and subsequently railroading an endotracheal tube over the bougie into the trachea. Techniques for achieving tracheal intubation include the use of the Aintree Intubation Catheter®, a guidewire-exchange catheter, a gum elastic bougie, and a small (<6.0 mm internal diameter) endotracheal tube. Conclusion The LMA Supreme has been shown to be a safe and efficacious device as a stand-alone supraglottic airway and may also be used as a conduit for tracheal intubation. Further trials are needed to determine the efficacy of the LMA Supreme compared with other supraglottic airways in both elective and emergent airway management situations.

AB - Purpose This article is a review of the efficacy and safety of the Laryngeal Mask Airway (LMA) SupremeTM as a stand-alone supraglottic airway during general anesthesia and as a conduit for tracheal intubation. Relevant articles were obtained using MEDLINE (1948-July 2011) and EMBASE (1980-July 2011). Only original studies with adult human patients and published in English were selected. Principal findings The LMA Supreme was found to be comparable with the LMA Proseal TM with regard to success rate, insertion time, and complications. However, in three studies, oropharyngeal leak pressure was higher with the LMA Proseal than with the LMA Supreme. The LMA Supreme was superior to the LMA ClassicTM with regard to insertion time and oropharyngeal seal pressure. The LMA Supreme was also used successfully in two difficult airway cases, and it has been used as a conduit for tracheal intubation by utilizing an intubation introducer (gum elastic bougie) and subsequently railroading an endotracheal tube over the bougie into the trachea. Techniques for achieving tracheal intubation include the use of the Aintree Intubation Catheter®, a guidewire-exchange catheter, a gum elastic bougie, and a small (<6.0 mm internal diameter) endotracheal tube. Conclusion The LMA Supreme has been shown to be a safe and efficacious device as a stand-alone supraglottic airway and may also be used as a conduit for tracheal intubation. Further trials are needed to determine the efficacy of the LMA Supreme compared with other supraglottic airways in both elective and emergent airway management situations.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84862775955&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84862775955&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s12630-012-9673-0

DO - 10.1007/s12630-012-9673-0

M3 - Review article

VL - 59

SP - 483

EP - 493

JO - Canadian Journal of Anaesthesia

JF - Canadian Journal of Anaesthesia

SN - 0832-610X

IS - 5

ER -