TY - GEN

T1 - Broadcast scheduling

T2 - 19th Annual ACM-SIAM Symposium on Discrete Algorithms

AU - Chang, Jessica

AU - Erlebach, Thomas

AU - Gailis, Renars

AU - Khuller, Samir

PY - 2008

Y1 - 2008

N2 - Broadcast Scheduling is a popular method for disseminating information in response to client requests. There are n pages of information, and clients request pages at different times. However, multiple clients can have their requests satisfied by a single broadcast of the requested page. In this paper we consider several related broadcast scheduling problems. One central problem we study simply asks to minimize the maximum response time (over all requests). Another related problem we consider is the version in which every request has a release time and a deadline, and the goal is to maximize the number of requests that meet their deadlines. While approximation algorithms for both these problems were proposed several years back, it was not known if they were NP-complete. One of our main results is that both these problems are NP-complete. In addition, we use the same unified approach to give a simple NP-completeness proof for minimizing the sum of response times. A very complicated proof was known for this version. Furthermore, we give a proof that FIFO is a 2-competitive online algorithm for minimizing the maximum response time (this result had been claimed earlier with no proof) and that there is no better deterministic online algorithm (this result was claimed earlier as well, but with an incorrect proof).

AB - Broadcast Scheduling is a popular method for disseminating information in response to client requests. There are n pages of information, and clients request pages at different times. However, multiple clients can have their requests satisfied by a single broadcast of the requested page. In this paper we consider several related broadcast scheduling problems. One central problem we study simply asks to minimize the maximum response time (over all requests). Another related problem we consider is the version in which every request has a release time and a deadline, and the goal is to maximize the number of requests that meet their deadlines. While approximation algorithms for both these problems were proposed several years back, it was not known if they were NP-complete. One of our main results is that both these problems are NP-complete. In addition, we use the same unified approach to give a simple NP-completeness proof for minimizing the sum of response times. A very complicated proof was known for this version. Furthermore, we give a proof that FIFO is a 2-competitive online algorithm for minimizing the maximum response time (this result had been claimed earlier with no proof) and that there is no better deterministic online algorithm (this result was claimed earlier as well, but with an incorrect proof).

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=55249121615&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=55249121615&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Conference contribution

AN - SCOPUS:55249121615

SN - 9780898716474

T3 - Proceedings of the Annual ACM-SIAM Symposium on Discrete Algorithms

SP - 473

EP - 482

BT - Proceedings of the 19th Annual ACM-SIAM Symposium on Discrete Algorithms

Y2 - 20 January 2008 through 22 January 2008

ER -