TY - JOUR
T1 - Building and accessing clausal representations
T2 - The advantage of first mention versus the advantage of clause recency
AU - Gernsbacher, Morton Ann
AU - Hargreaves, David J.
AU - Beeman, Mark
N1 - Funding Information:
We conducted this research while supported by NSF Grant BNS 8510096, and we prepared the manuscript while supported by NIH Research Career Development Award K04 NS-01376 and Air Force Office of Sponsored Research Grants 89-0258 and 89-0111 (all grants were awarded to MAG). Patrick Carey, Lori Lott, Julia Moravcsik, and Karen Wisegarver helped in many stages of this research, and we are especially indebted to Rachel Robertson and Kathy Varner. Doug Hintzman motivated us to conduct Experiment 4, and Gary Dell inspired Experiment 5. The manuscript benetitted from the comments of three anonymous reviewers. We reported this research at the 27th annual meeting of the Psychonomic Society, Chicago, IL, November, 1988. Please address correspondence and reprint requests to Dr. M. A. Gems-bather, Department of Psychology, University of Oregon, Eugene, OR, 97403-1227 or mortong@oregon. uoregon.edu.
PY - 1989/12
Y1 - 1989/12
N2 - We investigated two seemingly contradictory phenomena: the Advantage of the First-Mentioned Participant (participants mentioned first in a sentence are more accessible than participants mentioned second) and the Advantage of the Most Recent Clause (concepts mentioned in the most recent clause are more accessible than concepts mentioned in an earlier clause). We resolved this contradiction by measuring how quickly comprehenders accessed participants mentioned in the first versus second clauses of two-clause sentences. Our data supported the following hypotheses: Comprehenders represent each clause of a two-clause sentence in its own mental substructure. Comprehenders have greatest access to information in the substructure that they are currently developing; that is, they have greatest access to the most recent clause. However, at some point, the first clause becomes more accessible because the substructure representing the first clause of a two-clause sentence serves as a foundation for the whole sentence-level representation.
AB - We investigated two seemingly contradictory phenomena: the Advantage of the First-Mentioned Participant (participants mentioned first in a sentence are more accessible than participants mentioned second) and the Advantage of the Most Recent Clause (concepts mentioned in the most recent clause are more accessible than concepts mentioned in an earlier clause). We resolved this contradiction by measuring how quickly comprehenders accessed participants mentioned in the first versus second clauses of two-clause sentences. Our data supported the following hypotheses: Comprehenders represent each clause of a two-clause sentence in its own mental substructure. Comprehenders have greatest access to information in the substructure that they are currently developing; that is, they have greatest access to the most recent clause. However, at some point, the first clause becomes more accessible because the substructure representing the first clause of a two-clause sentence serves as a foundation for the whole sentence-level representation.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0000334675&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0000334675&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/0749-596X(89)90006-5
DO - 10.1016/0749-596X(89)90006-5
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:0000334675
VL - 28
SP - 735
EP - 755
JO - Journal of Memory and Language
JF - Journal of Memory and Language
SN - 0749-596X
IS - 6
ER -