TY - JOUR
T1 - Building cross-institutional collaborative infrastructure and processes
T2 - Early lessons from the chicago cancer health equity collaborative
AU - Chicago Cancer Health Equity Collaborative
AU - Simon, Melissa A.
AU - Fitzgibbon, Marian
AU - Ciecierski, Christina
AU - Cooper, Jennifer M.
AU - Martinez, Erica
AU - Tom, Laura
AU - Kanoon, Jacqueline
AU - Feinglass, Joseph
AU - Warnecke, Richard
AU - Stuart, Moira
AU - Stern, Michael
AU - Filus, Lidia
AU - Winn, Robert A.
N1 - Funding Information:
In year 1 of ChicagoCHEC, three pilot projects were funded under ChicagoCHEC’s Incubator and Catalyst Grant Program, the largest program within ChicagoCHEC activities and the main motivator for research innovation in cancer health inequities. Regulatory and compliance approvals in cycle one of the ChicagoCHEC Grant Program took nearly 6 months total from protocol submission to approval at all sites under UIC, NEIU, and Lurie’s institutional review boards (IRB). Both the UIC and NU Cancer Centers also required additional protocol approvals related to any cancer research. This delay in regulatory approvals led to some setbacks with project start dates, significantly affected project budgets
Publisher Copyright:
© 2019 Johns Hopkins University Press.
PY - 2019
Y1 - 2019
N2 - Background: Addressing cancer health disparities requires a multitiered, comprehensive approach. The Chicago Cancer Health Equity Collaborative (ChicagoCHEC) was established as a tri-institutional partnership to advance cancer health equity through scientific discovery, education, and community engagement. Objectives: Large-scale partnerships rarely document the challenges encountered when establishing processes and operations in the formative years of engagement. We outline selected lessons learned from the first three years of ChicagoCHEC in hopes that future collaborations may be better poised to hit the ground running and create the needed infrastructure for a strong, effective, and sustainable partnership. Lessons Learned: Unifying a diverse group of stakeholders under a shared mission is imperative. A shared governance structure, in which all individuals understand the aims of partnership and can facilitate progress, is crucial for success. Ongoing monitoring of collaborative processes should occur and attention should be given to the optimization of communications. Conclusions: Large-scale collaborative research and education projects across institutions can be challenging, particularly when establishing a working infrastructure and aligning priorities. However, the benefit of establishing key processes in the early years of the collaborative process can lead to high-quality research output, impact, and a sustainable partnership.
AB - Background: Addressing cancer health disparities requires a multitiered, comprehensive approach. The Chicago Cancer Health Equity Collaborative (ChicagoCHEC) was established as a tri-institutional partnership to advance cancer health equity through scientific discovery, education, and community engagement. Objectives: Large-scale partnerships rarely document the challenges encountered when establishing processes and operations in the formative years of engagement. We outline selected lessons learned from the first three years of ChicagoCHEC in hopes that future collaborations may be better poised to hit the ground running and create the needed infrastructure for a strong, effective, and sustainable partnership. Lessons Learned: Unifying a diverse group of stakeholders under a shared mission is imperative. A shared governance structure, in which all individuals understand the aims of partnership and can facilitate progress, is crucial for success. Ongoing monitoring of collaborative processes should occur and attention should be given to the optimization of communications. Conclusions: Large-scale collaborative research and education projects across institutions can be challenging, particularly when establishing a working infrastructure and aligning priorities. However, the benefit of establishing key processes in the early years of the collaborative process can lead to high-quality research output, impact, and a sustainable partnership.
KW - Collaboration
KW - Health disparities
KW - Health equity
KW - Multisite partnership
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85070395655&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85070395655&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1353/cpr.2019.0030
DO - 10.1353/cpr.2019.0030
M3 - Article
C2 - 31378727
AN - SCOPUS:85070395655
SN - 1557-0541
VL - 13
SP - 5
EP - 13
JO - Progress in Community Health Partnerships: Research, Education, and Action
JF - Progress in Community Health Partnerships: Research, Education, and Action
IS - Special Issue 2019
ER -