TY - JOUR
T1 - Building oncofertility core competency in developing countries
T2 - Experience from Egypt, Tunisia, Brazil, Peru, and Panama
AU - Salama, Mahmoud
AU - Ataman, Lauren
AU - Taha, Tamer
AU - Azmy, Osama
AU - Braham, Marouen
AU - Douik, Fatma
AU - Khrouf, Mohamed
AU - Rodrigues, Jhenifer Kliemchen
AU - Reis, Fernando M.
AU - Sánchez, Flor
AU - Romero, Sergio
AU - Vega, Mario
AU - Woodruff, Teresa K.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2018 by American Society of Clinical Oncology
PY - 2018/3/1
Y1 - 2018/3/1
N2 - Purpose: Little is known about oncofertility practice in developing countries that usually suffer from a shortage of health services, especially those related to cancer care. Materials and Methods: To learn more about oncofertility practice in developing countries, we generated a survey to explore the barriers and opportunities associated with oncofertility practice in five developing countries from Africa and Latin America within our Oncofertility Consortium Global Partners Network. Responses from Egypt, Tunisia, Brazil, Peru, and Panama were collected, reviewed, and discussed. Results: Common barriers were identified by each country, including financial barriers (lack of insurance coverage and high out-of-pocket costs for patients), lack of awareness among providers and patients, cultural and religious constraints, and lack of funding to help to support oncofertility programs. Conclusion: Despite barriers to care, many opportunities exist to grow the field of oncofertility in these five developing countries. It is important to continue to engage stakeholders in developing countries and use powerful networks in the United States and other developed countries to aid in the acceptance of oncofertility on a global level.
AB - Purpose: Little is known about oncofertility practice in developing countries that usually suffer from a shortage of health services, especially those related to cancer care. Materials and Methods: To learn more about oncofertility practice in developing countries, we generated a survey to explore the barriers and opportunities associated with oncofertility practice in five developing countries from Africa and Latin America within our Oncofertility Consortium Global Partners Network. Responses from Egypt, Tunisia, Brazil, Peru, and Panama were collected, reviewed, and discussed. Results: Common barriers were identified by each country, including financial barriers (lack of insurance coverage and high out-of-pocket costs for patients), lack of awareness among providers and patients, cultural and religious constraints, and lack of funding to help to support oncofertility programs. Conclusion: Despite barriers to care, many opportunities exist to grow the field of oncofertility in these five developing countries. It is important to continue to engage stakeholders in developing countries and use powerful networks in the United States and other developed countries to aid in the acceptance of oncofertility on a global level.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85053631581&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85053631581&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1200/JGO.17.00121
DO - 10.1200/JGO.17.00121
M3 - Article
C2 - 32259156
AN - SCOPUS:85053631581
SN - 2378-9506
VL - 2018
JO - Journal of global oncology
JF - Journal of global oncology
IS - 4
ER -