Calculation, Comparison, and the Incommensurable balancing risk in pain care

Megan Crowley-Matoka*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Pain is the most common reason for seeking medical care. Yet treating it is often fraught with uncertainty and a powerful sense of risk in American medicine, particularly in the context of the ongoing opioid crisis. Clinical consensus about the best way to manage many forms of pain remains elusive, and risks ramify beyond individual patients themselves to entangle clinicians and even society at large. The language of “balancing risk” often frames discussions—in both clinical decision-making and public policy—about whether to prioritize relieving pain or preventing addiction and whether to privilege individual or public health. This article takes up the notion of balancing risk to explore the way in which it embeds assumptions about commensurability of profoundly different forms and scales of risk, imagining that they can be calculated, compared, and brought into some kind of give-and-take alignment with one another. Thinking with a “dignity of risk” lens, however, suggests other possible frames, moving us away from such fictive calculations of risk in contemporary pain care and toward a more patient-focused clarification of risk.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Article number861785
Pages (from-to)337-344
Number of pages8
JournalPerspectives in biology and medicine
Volume65
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 1 2022

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Health Policy
  • Issues, ethics and legal aspects
  • History and Philosophy of Science

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Calculation, Comparison, and the Incommensurable balancing risk in pain care'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this