Campaign Rhetoric and the Incumbency Advantage

James N. Druckman, Martin J. Kifer*, Michael Parkin

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

The congressional incumbency advantage reflects an inequity in competition—candidates receive an electoral edge simply because they hold office. Scholars have identified an array of factors that contribute to the incumbency advantage; however, the role of electoral campaigns has been largely ignored. We argue that campaigns are a mechanism through which the incumbency advantage works. All else constant, incumbents focus their campaigns on factors that reflect their standing position, such as their familiarity to voters and actions taken for their district/state. Voters consequently rely on such incumbency factors when making their decisions. The outcome is challengers are at an extreme disadvantage, and campaigns offer scant substantive engagement. We offer evidence for these dynamics with a large-scale content analysis of campaign websites and an experiment. In so doing, we highlight a challenge to theories of democratic representation that focus on equal competition and/or substantive campaign engagement.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)22-43
Number of pages22
JournalAmerican Politics Research
Volume48
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2020

Keywords

  • Internet politics
  • campaigns
  • elections
  • experiment
  • incumbency

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Sociology and Political Science

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Campaign Rhetoric and the Incumbency Advantage'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

  • Cite this