Cancer fatalism and adherence to national cancer screening guidelines: Results from the Hispanic Community Health Study/Study of Latinos (HCHS/SOL)

Patricia I. Moreno, Betina Yanez, Steven J. Schuetz, Katy Wortman, Linda C. Gallo, Catherine Benedict, Carrie E. Brintz, Jianwen Cai, Sheila F. Castaneda, Krista M. Perreira, Patricia Gonzalez, Franklyn Gonzalez, Carmen R. Isasi, Frank J. Penedo*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

31 Scopus citations

Abstract

Background: Sociocultural factors, such as health insurance status, income, education, and acculturation, predict cancer screening among U.S. Hispanics/Latinos. However, these factors can be difficult to modify. More research is needed to identify individual-level modifiable factors that may improve screening and subsequent cancer outcomes in this population. The aim of this study was to examine cancer fatalism (i.e., the belief that there is little or nothing one can do to lower his/her risk of developing cancer) as a determinant of adherence to national screening guidelines for colorectal, breast, prostate, and cervical cancer among Hispanics/Latinos. Methods: Participants were from the multi-site Hispanic Community Health Study/Study of Latinos (HCHS/SOL) Sociocultural Ancillary Study (N = 5313). The National Cancer Institute (NCI) Health Interview National Trends Survey was used to assess cancer fatalism and receipt of cancer screening. Adherence was defined as following screening guidelines from United States Preventive Services Task Force and the American Cancer Society during the study period. Results: Adjusting for well-established determinants of cancer screening and covariates (health insurance status, income, education, acculturation, age, Hispanic/Latino background), lower cancer fatalism was marginally associated with greater adherence to screening for colorectal (OR 1.13, 95% CI [.99–1.30], p =.07), breast (OR 1.16, 95% CI [.99–1.36], p =.08) and prostate cancer (OR 1.18, 95% CI [.97–1.43], p =.10), but not cervical cancer. Conclusions: The associations of cancer fatalism were small and marginal, underlining that sociocultural factors are more robust determinants of cancer screening adherence among Hispanics/Latinos.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)39-45
Number of pages7
JournalCancer Epidemiology
Volume60
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 2019

Funding

The Hispanic Community Health Study/Study of Latinos (HCHS/SOL) was carried out as a collaborative study supported by contracts from the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI) to the University of North Carolina ( N01-HC65233 ), University of Miami ( N01-HC65234 ), Albert Einstein College of Medicine ( N01-HC65235 ), Northwestern University ( N01-HC65236 ), and San Diego State University ( N01-HC65237 ). The following Institutes/Centers/Offices contribute to the HCHS/SOL through a transfer of funds to the NHLBI: National Center on Minority Health and Health Disparities , the National Institute of Deafness and Other Communications Disorders , the National Institute of Dental and Craniofacial Research , the National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases , the National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke , and the Office of Dietary Supplements . The HCHS/SOL Sociocultural Ancillary Study (HCHS/SOL SCAS) was funded by NHLBI ( RC2 HL101649 ). P.I.M and S.J.S. was supported through a National Cancer Institute Training Grant ( 5T32CA193193 ). S.F.C. was supported by the SDSU/UCSD Cancer Center Comprehensive Partnership ( U54 CA13238406A1/U54 CA13237906A1 ). The Hispanic Community Health Study/Study of Latinos (HCHS/SOL) was carried out as a collaborative study supported by contracts from the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI) to the University of North Carolina (N01-HC65233), University of Miami (N01-HC65234), Albert Einstein College of Medicine (N01-HC65235), Northwestern University (N01-HC65236), and San Diego State University (N01-HC65237). The following Institutes/Centers/Offices contribute to the HCHS/SOL through a transfer of funds to the NHLBI: National Center on Minority Health and Health Disparities, the National Institute of Deafness and Other Communications Disorders, the National Institute of Dental and Craniofacial Research, the National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases, the National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke, and the Office of Dietary Supplements. The HCHS/SOL Sociocultural Ancillary Study (HCHS/SOL SCAS) was funded by NHLBI (RC2 HL101649). P.I.M and S.J.S. was supported through a National Cancer Institute Training Grant (5T32CA193193). S.F.C. was supported by the SDSU/UCSD Cancer Center Comprehensive Partnership (U54 CA13238406A1/U54 CA13237906A1). The authors thank the staff and participants of the Hispanic Community Health Study/Study of Latinos (HCHS/SOL) and the HCHS/SOL Sociocultural Ancillary Study (HCHS/SOL SCAS) for their important contributions.

Keywords

  • Adherence
  • Cancer prevention
  • Cancer screening
  • Fatalism
  • Health beliefs
  • Hispanic
  • Latino

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Epidemiology
  • Oncology
  • Cancer Research

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Cancer fatalism and adherence to national cancer screening guidelines: Results from the Hispanic Community Health Study/Study of Latinos (HCHS/SOL)'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this