TY - JOUR
T1 - Cardiac Rehabilitation Utilization during an Acute Cardiac Hospitalization
T2 - A NATIONAL SAMPLE
AU - Pack, Quinn R.
AU - Priya, Aruna
AU - Lagu, Tara
AU - Pekow, Penelope S.
AU - Berry, Robert
AU - Atreya, Auras R.
AU - Ades, Philip A.
AU - Lindenauer, Peter K.
N1 - Funding Information:
This work was supported by the National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences of the National Institutes of Health, award number KL2TR001063. Drs Lagu and Lindenauer were supported by the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute of the National Institutes of Health under award numbers K01HL114745 and 1K24HL132008, respectively. Dr Ades was supported by the Vermont Center on Behavior and Health (NIH-NIGMS P20GM103644). The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the NIH.
Publisher Copyright:
Copyright © 2019 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. Unauthorized reproduction of this article is prohibited.
PY - 2019/1/1
Y1 - 2019/1/1
N2 - Background: Inpatient cardiac rehabilitation (ICR) programs provide important services to hospitalized patients by delivering risk factor education, daily ambulation, and facilitation of referral to outpatient cardiac rehabilitation. However, little is known about ICR utilization or practice patterns. Methods: We examined the use of ICR, between January 2007 and June 2011, in a geographically and structurally diverse sample of US hospitals (Premier, Inc). Results: Among 458 hospitals, there were 1 343 537 admissions with a qualifying diagnosis for outpatient cardiac rehabilitation. Formal ICR was available at 223 (49%) of these hospitals. Overall, patient utilization of ICR was low (21.2%) and varied by indication. Utilization was highest in those undergoing cardiac surgery (43.3%) and lowest in patients with medically managed myocardial infarction (15.6%) or heart failure (10.6%). A larger bed count, the presence of cardiac interventional services, and Midwest location were associated with increased likelihood of a hospital having an ICR program. In multivariable hierarchical analysis adjusting for known hospital characteristics among hospitals that provided ICR, multiple patient factors were associated with a lower likelihood of ICR utilization, including older age, more comorbidities, female sex, and Medicare insurance, but unspecified hospital characteristics explained the vast majority of the variability. Conclusions: We found substantial variation in the delivery of ICR across US hospitals and by patient condition. Overall, only a minority of eligible patients ever received ICR and fewer than half of hospitals treating cardiac patients provided formal ICR services. This substantial gap in the secondary prevention of heart disease warrants further investigation and intervention.
AB - Background: Inpatient cardiac rehabilitation (ICR) programs provide important services to hospitalized patients by delivering risk factor education, daily ambulation, and facilitation of referral to outpatient cardiac rehabilitation. However, little is known about ICR utilization or practice patterns. Methods: We examined the use of ICR, between January 2007 and June 2011, in a geographically and structurally diverse sample of US hospitals (Premier, Inc). Results: Among 458 hospitals, there were 1 343 537 admissions with a qualifying diagnosis for outpatient cardiac rehabilitation. Formal ICR was available at 223 (49%) of these hospitals. Overall, patient utilization of ICR was low (21.2%) and varied by indication. Utilization was highest in those undergoing cardiac surgery (43.3%) and lowest in patients with medically managed myocardial infarction (15.6%) or heart failure (10.6%). A larger bed count, the presence of cardiac interventional services, and Midwest location were associated with increased likelihood of a hospital having an ICR program. In multivariable hierarchical analysis adjusting for known hospital characteristics among hospitals that provided ICR, multiple patient factors were associated with a lower likelihood of ICR utilization, including older age, more comorbidities, female sex, and Medicare insurance, but unspecified hospital characteristics explained the vast majority of the variability. Conclusions: We found substantial variation in the delivery of ICR across US hospitals and by patient condition. Overall, only a minority of eligible patients ever received ICR and fewer than half of hospitals treating cardiac patients provided formal ICR services. This substantial gap in the secondary prevention of heart disease warrants further investigation and intervention.
KW - cardiac rehabilitation
KW - epidemiology
KW - inpatient
KW - phase 1
KW - utilization
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85059131825&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85059131825&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1097/HCR.0000000000000374
DO - 10.1097/HCR.0000000000000374
M3 - Article
C2 - 30586111
AN - SCOPUS:85059131825
SN - 1932-7501
VL - 39
SP - 19
EP - 26
JO - Journal of Cardiopulmonary Rehabilitation and Prevention
JF - Journal of Cardiopulmonary Rehabilitation and Prevention
IS - 1
ER -