Abstract
Speaking involves both retrieving the sounds of a word (phonological planning) and realizing these selected sounds in fluid speech (articulation). Recent phonetic research on speech errors has argued that multiple candidate sounds in phonological planning can influence articulation because the pronunciation of mis-selected error sounds is slightly skewed towards unselected target sounds. Yet research to date has only examined these phonetic distortions in experimentally-elicited errors, leaving doubt as to whether they reflect tendencies in spontaneous speech. Here, we analyzed the pronunciation of speech errors of English-speaking adults in natural conversations relative to matched correct words by the same speakers, and found the conjectured phonetic distortions. Comparison of these data with a larger set of experimentally-elicited errors failed to reveal significant differences between the two types of errors. These findings provide ecologically-valid data supporting models that allow for information about multiple planning representations to simultaneously influence speech articulation.
Original language | English (US) |
---|---|
Article number | 104577 |
Journal | Cognition |
Volume | 210 |
DOIs | |
State | Published - May 2021 |
Funding
We would like to thank Jane Li for assistance with data collection and the audience at the 61st annual meeting of the Psychonomics Society for comments and questions. This work was supported in part by a Social Science and Humanities Research Council of Canada grant (435-2014-0452), a National Science Foundation grant (BCS0846147), and a National Institutes of Health grant (HD077140).
Keywords
- Articulation
- Cascading activation
- Phonetics
- Phonological encoding
- Speech errors
- Speech production
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Language and Linguistics
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
- Developmental and Educational Psychology
- Linguistics and Language
- Cognitive Neuroscience