Caveat patiens - Ethical dilemmas in decision -making

June M McKoy, Judith M. McKoy

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

More than 99,358 men, women and children are on organ transplant lists in the United States. Pressure on family members to donate organs can therefore be intense. The medical excuse was created to address this potential coercion. It is a fabricated anatomical or physiological reason given to a donor (with or without the donor's request) that provides an immediate shield against coercive pressure by family and friends on the potential donor. While the long-term risks and benefits of the medical excuse have not been studied, they could arguably include: 1) Reinforced perception that donation is expected; hence, declining donation is aberrant, and requires legitimization by external authority; 2) Eroded family trust of transplant physicians; 3) Eroded family trust in the individual reporting a "true" medical excuse; 4) Falsification of potential donor's medical record; 5) Development of "toxic secrets" in the family unit; 6) Paternalism; and 7) General erosion of trust in both health care providers and the healthcare system. This author proposes a system of transparent and balanced communication where both the potential donor and the transplant team are clearly cognizant of the voluntary nature of the purported donation and where provisions for "opting-out" occur at any point along the pre-transplantation continuum.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)390-395
Number of pages6
JournalCentral European Journal of Medicine
Volume3
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 1 2008

Fingerprint

Decision Making
Tissue Donors
Paternalism
Coercion
Transplants
Pressure
Poisons
Health Personnel
Medical Records
Transplantation
Communication
Delivery of Health Care
Physicians

Keywords

  • Decision making
  • Ethics
  • Medical excuse
  • Organ donation
  • Transplant

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Medicine(all)

Cite this

@article{a93947d2123346dc974631a6d48e537d,
title = "Caveat patiens - Ethical dilemmas in decision -making",
abstract = "More than 99,358 men, women and children are on organ transplant lists in the United States. Pressure on family members to donate organs can therefore be intense. The medical excuse was created to address this potential coercion. It is a fabricated anatomical or physiological reason given to a donor (with or without the donor's request) that provides an immediate shield against coercive pressure by family and friends on the potential donor. While the long-term risks and benefits of the medical excuse have not been studied, they could arguably include: 1) Reinforced perception that donation is expected; hence, declining donation is aberrant, and requires legitimization by external authority; 2) Eroded family trust of transplant physicians; 3) Eroded family trust in the individual reporting a {"}true{"} medical excuse; 4) Falsification of potential donor's medical record; 5) Development of {"}toxic secrets{"} in the family unit; 6) Paternalism; and 7) General erosion of trust in both health care providers and the healthcare system. This author proposes a system of transparent and balanced communication where both the potential donor and the transplant team are clearly cognizant of the voluntary nature of the purported donation and where provisions for {"}opting-out{"} occur at any point along the pre-transplantation continuum.",
keywords = "Decision making, Ethics, Medical excuse, Organ donation, Transplant",
author = "McKoy, {June M} and McKoy, {Judith M.}",
year = "2008",
month = "12",
day = "1",
doi = "10.2478/s11536-008-0048-4",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "3",
pages = "390--395",
journal = "Central European Journal of Medicine",
issn = "1895-1058",
publisher = "Springer Verlag",
number = "4",

}

Caveat patiens - Ethical dilemmas in decision -making. / McKoy, June M; McKoy, Judith M.

In: Central European Journal of Medicine, Vol. 3, No. 4, 01.12.2008, p. 390-395.

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

TY - JOUR

T1 - Caveat patiens - Ethical dilemmas in decision -making

AU - McKoy, June M

AU - McKoy, Judith M.

PY - 2008/12/1

Y1 - 2008/12/1

N2 - More than 99,358 men, women and children are on organ transplant lists in the United States. Pressure on family members to donate organs can therefore be intense. The medical excuse was created to address this potential coercion. It is a fabricated anatomical or physiological reason given to a donor (with or without the donor's request) that provides an immediate shield against coercive pressure by family and friends on the potential donor. While the long-term risks and benefits of the medical excuse have not been studied, they could arguably include: 1) Reinforced perception that donation is expected; hence, declining donation is aberrant, and requires legitimization by external authority; 2) Eroded family trust of transplant physicians; 3) Eroded family trust in the individual reporting a "true" medical excuse; 4) Falsification of potential donor's medical record; 5) Development of "toxic secrets" in the family unit; 6) Paternalism; and 7) General erosion of trust in both health care providers and the healthcare system. This author proposes a system of transparent and balanced communication where both the potential donor and the transplant team are clearly cognizant of the voluntary nature of the purported donation and where provisions for "opting-out" occur at any point along the pre-transplantation continuum.

AB - More than 99,358 men, women and children are on organ transplant lists in the United States. Pressure on family members to donate organs can therefore be intense. The medical excuse was created to address this potential coercion. It is a fabricated anatomical or physiological reason given to a donor (with or without the donor's request) that provides an immediate shield against coercive pressure by family and friends on the potential donor. While the long-term risks and benefits of the medical excuse have not been studied, they could arguably include: 1) Reinforced perception that donation is expected; hence, declining donation is aberrant, and requires legitimization by external authority; 2) Eroded family trust of transplant physicians; 3) Eroded family trust in the individual reporting a "true" medical excuse; 4) Falsification of potential donor's medical record; 5) Development of "toxic secrets" in the family unit; 6) Paternalism; and 7) General erosion of trust in both health care providers and the healthcare system. This author proposes a system of transparent and balanced communication where both the potential donor and the transplant team are clearly cognizant of the voluntary nature of the purported donation and where provisions for "opting-out" occur at any point along the pre-transplantation continuum.

KW - Decision making

KW - Ethics

KW - Medical excuse

KW - Organ donation

KW - Transplant

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=54349109066&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=54349109066&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.2478/s11536-008-0048-4

DO - 10.2478/s11536-008-0048-4

M3 - Review article

VL - 3

SP - 390

EP - 395

JO - Central European Journal of Medicine

JF - Central European Journal of Medicine

SN - 1895-1058

IS - 4

ER -