Centripetal and centrifugal forces in the moral circle

Competing constraints on moral learning

Jesse Graham*, Adam Waytz, Peter Meindl, Ravi Iyer, Liane Young

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

8 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The idea of the moral circle pictures the self in the center, surrounded by concentric circles encompassing increasingly distant possible targets of moral concern, including family, local community, nation, all humans, all mammals, all living things including plants, and all things including inanimate objects. The authors develop the idea of two opposing forces in people's moral circles, with centripetal forces pulling inward, urging greater concern for close others than for distant others, and centrifugal forces pushing outward, resisting “drawing the line” anywhere as a form of prejudice and urging egalitarian concern for all regardless of social distance. Review of the developmental literature shows very early emergence of both moral forces, suggesting at least partly intuitive bases for each. Moral education approaches favoring one force over the other are compared, to show how these forces can provide constraints on moral learning. Finally, the centripetal/centrifugal forces view is applied to current moral debates about empathy and about politics. The authors argue that this view helps us see how intercultural and interpersonal disagreements about morality are based in intrapersonal conflicts shared by all people.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)58-65
Number of pages8
JournalCognition
Volume167
DOIs
StatePublished - Oct 1 2017

Fingerprint

Social Distance
Ego
Politics
Mammals
Learning
Education
moral education
social distance
empathy
prejudice
morality
learning
politics
community
Conflict (Psychology)
Centripetal
Centrifugal
literature

Keywords

  • Empathy
  • Ideology
  • Moral development
  • Moral education
  • Moral learning

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
  • Language and Linguistics
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology
  • Linguistics and Language
  • Cognitive Neuroscience

Cite this

Graham, Jesse ; Waytz, Adam ; Meindl, Peter ; Iyer, Ravi ; Young, Liane. / Centripetal and centrifugal forces in the moral circle : Competing constraints on moral learning. In: Cognition. 2017 ; Vol. 167. pp. 58-65.
@article{af1103aac72949128a05491968893df5,
title = "Centripetal and centrifugal forces in the moral circle: Competing constraints on moral learning",
abstract = "The idea of the moral circle pictures the self in the center, surrounded by concentric circles encompassing increasingly distant possible targets of moral concern, including family, local community, nation, all humans, all mammals, all living things including plants, and all things including inanimate objects. The authors develop the idea of two opposing forces in people's moral circles, with centripetal forces pulling inward, urging greater concern for close others than for distant others, and centrifugal forces pushing outward, resisting “drawing the line” anywhere as a form of prejudice and urging egalitarian concern for all regardless of social distance. Review of the developmental literature shows very early emergence of both moral forces, suggesting at least partly intuitive bases for each. Moral education approaches favoring one force over the other are compared, to show how these forces can provide constraints on moral learning. Finally, the centripetal/centrifugal forces view is applied to current moral debates about empathy and about politics. The authors argue that this view helps us see how intercultural and interpersonal disagreements about morality are based in intrapersonal conflicts shared by all people.",
keywords = "Empathy, Ideology, Moral development, Moral education, Moral learning",
author = "Jesse Graham and Adam Waytz and Peter Meindl and Ravi Iyer and Liane Young",
year = "2017",
month = "10",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.cognition.2016.12.001",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "167",
pages = "58--65",
journal = "Cognition",
issn = "0010-0277",
publisher = "Elsevier",

}

Centripetal and centrifugal forces in the moral circle : Competing constraints on moral learning. / Graham, Jesse; Waytz, Adam; Meindl, Peter; Iyer, Ravi; Young, Liane.

In: Cognition, Vol. 167, 01.10.2017, p. 58-65.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Centripetal and centrifugal forces in the moral circle

T2 - Competing constraints on moral learning

AU - Graham, Jesse

AU - Waytz, Adam

AU - Meindl, Peter

AU - Iyer, Ravi

AU - Young, Liane

PY - 2017/10/1

Y1 - 2017/10/1

N2 - The idea of the moral circle pictures the self in the center, surrounded by concentric circles encompassing increasingly distant possible targets of moral concern, including family, local community, nation, all humans, all mammals, all living things including plants, and all things including inanimate objects. The authors develop the idea of two opposing forces in people's moral circles, with centripetal forces pulling inward, urging greater concern for close others than for distant others, and centrifugal forces pushing outward, resisting “drawing the line” anywhere as a form of prejudice and urging egalitarian concern for all regardless of social distance. Review of the developmental literature shows very early emergence of both moral forces, suggesting at least partly intuitive bases for each. Moral education approaches favoring one force over the other are compared, to show how these forces can provide constraints on moral learning. Finally, the centripetal/centrifugal forces view is applied to current moral debates about empathy and about politics. The authors argue that this view helps us see how intercultural and interpersonal disagreements about morality are based in intrapersonal conflicts shared by all people.

AB - The idea of the moral circle pictures the self in the center, surrounded by concentric circles encompassing increasingly distant possible targets of moral concern, including family, local community, nation, all humans, all mammals, all living things including plants, and all things including inanimate objects. The authors develop the idea of two opposing forces in people's moral circles, with centripetal forces pulling inward, urging greater concern for close others than for distant others, and centrifugal forces pushing outward, resisting “drawing the line” anywhere as a form of prejudice and urging egalitarian concern for all regardless of social distance. Review of the developmental literature shows very early emergence of both moral forces, suggesting at least partly intuitive bases for each. Moral education approaches favoring one force over the other are compared, to show how these forces can provide constraints on moral learning. Finally, the centripetal/centrifugal forces view is applied to current moral debates about empathy and about politics. The authors argue that this view helps us see how intercultural and interpersonal disagreements about morality are based in intrapersonal conflicts shared by all people.

KW - Empathy

KW - Ideology

KW - Moral development

KW - Moral education

KW - Moral learning

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85008324754&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85008324754&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.cognition.2016.12.001

DO - 10.1016/j.cognition.2016.12.001

M3 - Article

VL - 167

SP - 58

EP - 65

JO - Cognition

JF - Cognition

SN - 0010-0277

ER -