Challenges and Controversies in Peer Review: JACC Review Topic of the Week

Peer Review Task Force of the Scientific Publications Committee

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

4 Scopus citations


The process of peer review has been the gold standard for evaluating medical science, but significant pressures from the recent COVID-19 pandemic, new methods of communication, larger amounts of research, and an evolving publication landscape have placed significant pressures on this system. A task force convened by the American College of Cardiology identified the 5 most significant controversies associated with the current peer-review process: the effect of preprints, reviewer blinding, reviewer selection, reviewer incentivization, and publication of peer reviewer comments. Although specific solutions to these issues will vary, regardless of how scientific communication evolves, peer review must remain an essential process for ensuring scientific integrity, timely dissemination of information, and better patient care. In medicine, the peer-review process is crucial because harm can occur if poor-quality data or incorrect conclusions are published. With the dramatic increase in scientific publications and new methods of communication, high-quality peer review is more important now than ever.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)2054-2062
Number of pages9
JournalJournal of the American College of Cardiology
Issue number21
StatePublished - Nov 21 2023


  • peer review
  • preprints
  • scientific communication

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine


Dive into the research topics of 'Challenges and Controversies in Peer Review: JACC Review Topic of the Week'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this