TY - JOUR
T1 - Change in Health Literacy over a Decade in a Prospective Cohort of Community-Dwelling Older Adults
AU - Curtis, Laura M.
AU - Kwasny, Mary J.
AU - Opsasnick, Lauren
AU - O’Conor, Rachel M.
AU - Yoshino-Benavente, Julia
AU - Eifler, Morgan
AU - Federman, Alex D.
AU - Altschul, Drew
AU - Wolf, Michael S.
N1 - Funding Information:
The study was financially supported by the National Institutes of Health (R01AG030611) and the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (R01HL116630).
Funding Information:
Dr. Wolf reports grants and personal fees from Pfizer, personal fees from Sanofi, grants from Merck, grants from Eli Lilly, grants from Amgen, personal fees from Luto UK, personal fees from MedLearning Group, and grants from Gordon And Betty Moore Foundation, outside the submitted work. No other authors reported conflicts of interest.
Funding Information:
This research was supported by the National Institute of Aging (R01AG030611) and the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (R01HL116630). The funders had no role in the design, conduct, study analysis, or the decision to submit the manuscript for publication.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2021, Society of General Internal Medicine.
PY - 2021/4
Y1 - 2021/4
N2 - Background: Health literacy is often viewed as a static trait in longitudinal studies, which may over or underestimate an individual’s ability to manage one’s health. Objectives: We sought to examine health literacy over time among older adults using three widely used measures. Design: A prospective cohort study. Participants: Community-dwelling adults ages 55 to 74 at baseline with at least one follow-up visit (N = 656) recruited from one academic internal medicine clinic and six community health centers in Chicago, IL. Measures: Health literacy was measured using the Test of Functional Health Literacy in Adults (TOFHLA), Newest Vital Sign (NVS), and Rapid Estimate of Adult Literacy in Medicine (REALM) at baseline and up to three follow-up time points. Results: In unadjusted analyses, significant changes since baseline were found beginning at the second follow-up (mean (M) = 6.0 years, SD = 0.6) for the TOFHLA (M = − 0.9, SD = 0.95, p = 0.049) and the REALM (M = 0.3, SD = 2.5, p = 0.004) and at the last follow-up (M = 8.6 years, SD = 0.5) for the NVS (M = − 0.2, SD = 1.4, p = 0.02). There were non-linear effects of baseline age on TOFHLA and NVS scores over time (piecewise cubic spline p = 0.01 and p < 0.001, respectively) and no effect on REALM scores (B = 0.02, 95% CI − 0.01 to 0.04, p = 0.17) using multivariable mixed-effects linear regression models, controlling for race, education, income, and comorbidity. Conclusion: We found a negative relationship between age and health literacy over time as measured by the TOFHLA and NVS. Health literacy barriers appear to be more prevalent among individuals in later life, when self-care demands are similarly increasing. Clinicians might consider strategies to assess and respond to limited health literacy, particularly among patients 70 and older. REALM performance remained stable over 10 years of follow-up. This questions whether health literacy tools measure the same attribute. Prospective health literacy studies should carefully consider what measures to use, depending on their objective.
AB - Background: Health literacy is often viewed as a static trait in longitudinal studies, which may over or underestimate an individual’s ability to manage one’s health. Objectives: We sought to examine health literacy over time among older adults using three widely used measures. Design: A prospective cohort study. Participants: Community-dwelling adults ages 55 to 74 at baseline with at least one follow-up visit (N = 656) recruited from one academic internal medicine clinic and six community health centers in Chicago, IL. Measures: Health literacy was measured using the Test of Functional Health Literacy in Adults (TOFHLA), Newest Vital Sign (NVS), and Rapid Estimate of Adult Literacy in Medicine (REALM) at baseline and up to three follow-up time points. Results: In unadjusted analyses, significant changes since baseline were found beginning at the second follow-up (mean (M) = 6.0 years, SD = 0.6) for the TOFHLA (M = − 0.9, SD = 0.95, p = 0.049) and the REALM (M = 0.3, SD = 2.5, p = 0.004) and at the last follow-up (M = 8.6 years, SD = 0.5) for the NVS (M = − 0.2, SD = 1.4, p = 0.02). There were non-linear effects of baseline age on TOFHLA and NVS scores over time (piecewise cubic spline p = 0.01 and p < 0.001, respectively) and no effect on REALM scores (B = 0.02, 95% CI − 0.01 to 0.04, p = 0.17) using multivariable mixed-effects linear regression models, controlling for race, education, income, and comorbidity. Conclusion: We found a negative relationship between age and health literacy over time as measured by the TOFHLA and NVS. Health literacy barriers appear to be more prevalent among individuals in later life, when self-care demands are similarly increasing. Clinicians might consider strategies to assess and respond to limited health literacy, particularly among patients 70 and older. REALM performance remained stable over 10 years of follow-up. This questions whether health literacy tools measure the same attribute. Prospective health literacy studies should carefully consider what measures to use, depending on their objective.
KW - aging
KW - cognition
KW - health literacy
KW - prospective
KW - self-management
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85100714795&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85100714795&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1007/s11606-020-06423-8
DO - 10.1007/s11606-020-06423-8
M3 - Article
C2 - 33559068
AN - SCOPUS:85100714795
SN - 0884-8734
VL - 36
SP - 916
EP - 922
JO - Journal of general internal medicine
JF - Journal of general internal medicine
IS - 4
ER -