TY - JOUR
T1 - Changes in the quality of care during progress from stage 1 to stage 2 of Meaningful Use
AU - Levine, David M.
AU - Healey, Michael J.
AU - Wright, Adam
AU - Bates, David W.
AU - Linder, Jeffrey A.
AU - Samal, Lipika
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© The Author 2017. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the American Medical Informatics Association. All rights reserved.
PY - 2017/3/1
Y1 - 2017/3/1
N2 - Background: The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) canceled Meaningful Use (MU), replacing it with Advancing Care Information, which preserves many MU elements. Therefore, transitioning from MU stage 1 to MU stage 2 has important implications for the new policy, yet the quality of care provided by physicians transitioning from MU1 to MU2 is unknown. Methods: Retrospective longitudinal evaluation of the quality of care delivered by outpatient physicians at an academic medical center in the transition between MU1 and MU2. Results: Between MU1 and MU2, 4 measures improved: hypertension control (35% vs 40%), influenza immunization (63% vs 68%), tobacco use assessment/counseling (86% vs 96%), and diabetes control (93% vs 96%; P all <.01). One worsened: senior weight screening/follow-up (54% vs 49%; P<.01). Two were unchanged: chlamydia screening and adult weight screening/follow-up. Conclusion: In this single-site study, when clinicians progressed from MU1 to MU2, 4 quality measures improved, 2 were unchanged, and 1 worsened. Analysis of national data should guide policy decisions about the content of MU's successor.
AB - Background: The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) canceled Meaningful Use (MU), replacing it with Advancing Care Information, which preserves many MU elements. Therefore, transitioning from MU stage 1 to MU stage 2 has important implications for the new policy, yet the quality of care provided by physicians transitioning from MU1 to MU2 is unknown. Methods: Retrospective longitudinal evaluation of the quality of care delivered by outpatient physicians at an academic medical center in the transition between MU1 and MU2. Results: Between MU1 and MU2, 4 measures improved: hypertension control (35% vs 40%), influenza immunization (63% vs 68%), tobacco use assessment/counseling (86% vs 96%), and diabetes control (93% vs 96%; P all <.01). One worsened: senior weight screening/follow-up (54% vs 49%; P<.01). Two were unchanged: chlamydia screening and adult weight screening/follow-up. Conclusion: In this single-site study, when clinicians progressed from MU1 to MU2, 4 quality measures improved, 2 were unchanged, and 1 worsened. Analysis of national data should guide policy decisions about the content of MU's successor.
KW - Electronic health records
KW - Meaningful usequality improvement
KW - Medical records
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85016241341&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85016241341&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1093/jamia/ocw127
DO - 10.1093/jamia/ocw127
M3 - Article
C2 - 27567000
AN - SCOPUS:85016241341
SN - 1067-5027
VL - 24
SP - 394
EP - 397
JO - Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association
JF - Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association
IS - 2
M1 - ocw127
ER -