TY - JOUR
T1 - Characterizing Biphasic Food-Related Allergic Reactions Through a US Food Allergy Patient Registry
AU - Gupta, Ruchi S.
AU - Sehgal, Shruti
AU - Brown, Dannielle A.
AU - Das, Rajeshree
AU - Fierstein, Jamie L.
AU - Casale, Thomas B.
AU - Nowak-Wegrzyn, Anna H.
AU - Bilaver, Lucy A.
N1 - Funding Information:
Conflicts of Interest: R. Gupta receives research grant support from the National Institutes of Health , Food Allergy Research and Education (FARE), Stanford Sean N. Parker Center for Allergy Research , UnitedHealth Group , Thermo Fisher Scientific , Genentech , and the National Confectioners Association ; and has served as a medical consultant/advisor for Aimmune Therapeutics, Genentech, Before Brands, Kaléo, DBV Technologies, ICER, DOTS Technology, and FARE. L. A. Bilaver receives research grant support from the National Institutes of Health , Thermo Fisher Scientific , FARE , Genentech , National Confectioners Association , and Before Brands Inc. A. H. Nowak-Wegrzyn reports research support from National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases , Danone , and Nestlé , and consultancy fees from Regeneron, Novartis, and Gerber Institute; she serves as the deputy editor for the Annals of Allergy, Asthma, and Immunology and the chair of the Medical Advisory Board of the International FPIES Association. The rest of the authors declare that they have no relevant conflicts of interest.
Funding Information:
This work was supported by funds from Food Allergy Research and Education.Conflicts of Interest: R. Gupta receives research grant support from the National Institutes of Health, Food Allergy Research and Education (FARE), Stanford Sean N. Parker Center for Allergy Research, UnitedHealth Group, Thermo Fisher Scientific, Genentech, and the National Confectioners Association; and has served as a medical consultant/advisor for Aimmune Therapeutics, Genentech, Before Brands, Kal?o, DBV Technologies, ICER, DOTS Technology, and FARE. L. A. Bilaver receives research grant support from the National Institutes of Health, Thermo Fisher Scientific, FARE, Genentech, National Confectioners Association, and Before Brands Inc. A. H. Nowak-Wegrzyn reports research support from National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, Danone, and Nestl?, and consultancy fees from Regeneron, Novartis, and Gerber Institute; she serves as the deputy editor for the Annals of Allergy, Asthma, and Immunology and the chair of the Medical Advisory Board of the International FPIES Association. The rest of the authors declare that they have no relevant conflicts of interest.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2021 American Academy of Allergy, Asthma & Immunology
PY - 2021/10
Y1 - 2021/10
N2 - Background: Understanding about patient-reported biphasic food-related allergic reactions is currently sparse. Objective: To characterize patient-reported biphasic food-related allergic reactions among a national food allergy registry. Methods: We used two patient registry surveys established by Food Allergy Research and Education. Variables were described with proportions and 95% confidence intervals (CIs); unadjusted results were stratified by respondent type. Multivariable logistic regression evaluated the adjusted odds of reporting a biphasic reaction. Results: The incidence of reported biphasic reactions was 16.4% (95% CI, 15.3-17.7). A total of 12.8% of parent or guardian respondents (95% CI, 12.5-14.3) and 21.8% of self-respondents (95% CI, 19.7-23.8) indicated a biphasic reaction during their most recent food-allergic reaction. Among respondents with a mild initial reaction, 7.4% reported a biphasic reaction, compared with 30% with a very severe initial reaction. When the initial reaction was mild, 69.6% of parent or guardian respondents (95% CI, 47.2-85.4) and 52.0% of self-respondents (95% CI, 38.0-35.7) with a biphasic reaction reported a mild secondary reaction. When the initial reaction was very severe, 36.3% of parent or guardian respondents (95% CI, 26.4-47.5) and 42.9% of self-respondents (95% CI, 31.1-55.5) with a biphasic reaction reported a very severe secondary reaction. Female sex, Black race, reaction age 5-12 and 26-66 years, initial moderate, severe, or very severe reaction, and one or more annual reactions were associated with increased odds of a biphasic reaction. Conclusions: This study characterizes the incidence of patient-reported biphasic reactions and provides valuable information on the probable severity of a biphasic food-related allergic reaction. Further research is necessary to understand the epidemiology of food-related biphasic reactions.
AB - Background: Understanding about patient-reported biphasic food-related allergic reactions is currently sparse. Objective: To characterize patient-reported biphasic food-related allergic reactions among a national food allergy registry. Methods: We used two patient registry surveys established by Food Allergy Research and Education. Variables were described with proportions and 95% confidence intervals (CIs); unadjusted results were stratified by respondent type. Multivariable logistic regression evaluated the adjusted odds of reporting a biphasic reaction. Results: The incidence of reported biphasic reactions was 16.4% (95% CI, 15.3-17.7). A total of 12.8% of parent or guardian respondents (95% CI, 12.5-14.3) and 21.8% of self-respondents (95% CI, 19.7-23.8) indicated a biphasic reaction during their most recent food-allergic reaction. Among respondents with a mild initial reaction, 7.4% reported a biphasic reaction, compared with 30% with a very severe initial reaction. When the initial reaction was mild, 69.6% of parent or guardian respondents (95% CI, 47.2-85.4) and 52.0% of self-respondents (95% CI, 38.0-35.7) with a biphasic reaction reported a mild secondary reaction. When the initial reaction was very severe, 36.3% of parent or guardian respondents (95% CI, 26.4-47.5) and 42.9% of self-respondents (95% CI, 31.1-55.5) with a biphasic reaction reported a very severe secondary reaction. Female sex, Black race, reaction age 5-12 and 26-66 years, initial moderate, severe, or very severe reaction, and one or more annual reactions were associated with increased odds of a biphasic reaction. Conclusions: This study characterizes the incidence of patient-reported biphasic reactions and provides valuable information on the probable severity of a biphasic food-related allergic reaction. Further research is necessary to understand the epidemiology of food-related biphasic reactions.
KW - Biphasic reaction
KW - Food allergic reactions
KW - Food allergy
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85108597460&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85108597460&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.jaip.2021.05.009
DO - 10.1016/j.jaip.2021.05.009
M3 - Article
C2 - 34033980
AN - SCOPUS:85108597460
SN - 2213-2198
VL - 9
SP - 3717
EP - 3727
JO - Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology: In Practice
JF - Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology: In Practice
IS - 10
ER -