TY - JOUR
T1 - Chronic right bundle branch block and left posterior hemiblock. Clinical, electrophysiologic and prognostic observations
AU - Dhingra, Ramesh C.
AU - Denes, Pablo
AU - Wu, Delon
AU - Chuquimia, Ruben
AU - Amat-Y-Leon, Fernando
AU - Wyndham, Christopher
AU - Rosen, Kenneth M.
PY - 1975/12
Y1 - 1975/12
N2 - Twenty-one patients with long-term right bundle branch block and left posterior hemiblock were studied electrophysiologically and then followed up prospectively. The group consisted of 19 men and 2 women aged 61 ± 2.7 years (mean ± standard error of the mean). The majority of patients had either hypertensive cardiovascular disease (48 percent) or primary conduction disease (33 percent). Initial electrophysiologic studies revealed A-H intervals of 58 to 152 msec (mean 98 ±7.7) and H-V intervals of 40 to 80 msec (mean 52 ± 2.1). Six patients (29 percent) had prolonged H-V intervals. The follow-up period ranged from 91 to 1,231 days (mean 671 ± 68). Three of 21 patients (14 percent) needed a permanent pacemaker after development of the following symptomatic conduction disease: sinoatrial block on day 3 of follow-up; second degree atrioventricular (A-V) block, site undetermined, on day 118; and second degree A-V block proximal to the His bundle on day 398. One patient died suddenly (on day 571), and two others died of noncardiac causes. In conclusion, combined right bundle branch block and left posterior hemiblock was associated with less trifascicular disease than reported previously. The clinical course of most of the patients was benign and the incidence of sudden death was relatively small. Symptomatic conduction disease occurred but could be definitely related to trifascicular disease in only one patient. These short-term data suggest that prophylactic pacemaker insertion is not routinely indicated in patients with chronic right bundle branch block and left posterior hemiblock.
AB - Twenty-one patients with long-term right bundle branch block and left posterior hemiblock were studied electrophysiologically and then followed up prospectively. The group consisted of 19 men and 2 women aged 61 ± 2.7 years (mean ± standard error of the mean). The majority of patients had either hypertensive cardiovascular disease (48 percent) or primary conduction disease (33 percent). Initial electrophysiologic studies revealed A-H intervals of 58 to 152 msec (mean 98 ±7.7) and H-V intervals of 40 to 80 msec (mean 52 ± 2.1). Six patients (29 percent) had prolonged H-V intervals. The follow-up period ranged from 91 to 1,231 days (mean 671 ± 68). Three of 21 patients (14 percent) needed a permanent pacemaker after development of the following symptomatic conduction disease: sinoatrial block on day 3 of follow-up; second degree atrioventricular (A-V) block, site undetermined, on day 118; and second degree A-V block proximal to the His bundle on day 398. One patient died suddenly (on day 571), and two others died of noncardiac causes. In conclusion, combined right bundle branch block and left posterior hemiblock was associated with less trifascicular disease than reported previously. The clinical course of most of the patients was benign and the incidence of sudden death was relatively small. Symptomatic conduction disease occurred but could be definitely related to trifascicular disease in only one patient. These short-term data suggest that prophylactic pacemaker insertion is not routinely indicated in patients with chronic right bundle branch block and left posterior hemiblock.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0016592651&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0016592651&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/0002-9149(75)90075-2
DO - 10.1016/0002-9149(75)90075-2
M3 - Article
C2 - 1199943
AN - SCOPUS:0016592651
VL - 36
SP - 867
EP - 872
JO - American Journal of Cardiology
JF - American Journal of Cardiology
SN - 0002-9149
IS - 7
ER -