Cilofexor, a Nonsteroidal FXR Agonist, in Patients With Noncirrhotic NASH: A Phase 2 Randomized Controlled Trial

Keyur Patel*, Stephen A. Harrison, Magdy Elkhashab, James F. Trotter, Robert Herring, Sergio E. Rojter, Zeid Kayali, Vincent Wai Sun Wong, Susan Greenbloom, Saumya Jayakumar, Mitchell L. Shiffman, Bradley Freilich, Eric J. Lawitz, Edward J. Gane, Eliza Harting, Jun Xu, Andrew N. Billin, Chuhan Chung, C. Stephen Djedjos, G. Mani SubramanianRobert P. Myers, Michael S. Middleton, Mary Rinella, Mazen Noureddin

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

264 Scopus citations

Abstract

Background and Aims: We evaluated the safety and efficacy of cilofexor (formerly GS-9674), a small-molecule nonsteroidal agonist of farnesoid X receptor, in patients with nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH). Approach and Results: In this double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 2 trial, 140 patients with noncirrhotic NASH, diagnosed by magnetic resonance imaging–proton density fat fraction (MRI-PDFF) ≥8% and liver stiffness ≥2.5 kPa by magnetic resonance elastography (MRE) or historical liver biopsy, were randomized to receive cilofexor 100 mg (n = 56), 30 mg (n = 56), or placebo (n = 28) orally once daily for 24 weeks. MRI-PDFF, liver stiffness by MRE and transient elastography, and serum markers of fibrosis were measured at baseline and week 24. At baseline, median MRI-PDFF was 16.3% and MRE-stiffness was 3.27 kPa. At week 24, patients receiving cilofexor 100 mg had a median relative decrease in MRI-PDFF of −22.7%, compared with an increase of 1.9% in those receiving placebo (P = 0.003); the 30-mg group had a relative decrease of −1.8% (P = 0.17 vs. placebo). Declines in MRI-PDFF of ≥30% were experienced by 39% of patients receiving cilofexor 100 mg (P = 0.011 vs. placebo), 14% of those receiving cilofexor 30 mg (P = 0.87 vs. placebo), and 13% of those receiving placebo. Serum gamma-glutamyltransferase, C4, and primary bile acids decreased significantly at week 24 in both cilofexor treatment groups, whereas significant changes in Enhanced Liver Fibrosis scores and liver stiffness were not observed. Cilofexor was generally well-tolerated. Moderate to severe pruritus was more common in patients receiving cilofexor 100 mg (14%) than in those receiving cilofexor 30 mg (4%) and placebo (4%). Conclusions: Cilofexor for 24 weeks was well-tolerated and provided significant reductions in hepatic steatosis, liver biochemistry, and serum bile acids in patients with NASH. ClinicalTrials.gov No. NCT02854605.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)58-71
Number of pages14
JournalHepatology
Volume72
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jul 1 2020

Funding

The study was approved by the institutional review board or independent ethics committee at participating sites and conducted in compliance with the Declaration of Helsinki, Good Clinical Practice guidelines, and local regulatory requirements. The study was designed and conducted by the sponsor (Gilead Sciences) in collaboration with the principal investigator (K.P.) according to the protocol. The sponsor collected the data, monitored the study conduct, and performed all statistical analyses. An independent data safety monitoring committee reviewed the progress of the study. All authors had access to the data, assumed responsibility for the integrity and completeness of the reported data, and reviewed and approved the manuscript. The study enrolled adults ages 18 to 75 years with suspected NASH based on a clinical diagnosis of NAFLD along with an estimated magnetic resonance imaging–proton density fat fraction (MRI-PDFF) value of ≥8% and liver stiffness by magnetic resonance elastography (MRE) of ≥2.5 kPa, or a historical biopsy within 12 months of screening consistent with NASH and F1-F3 fibrosis (ClinicalTrials.gov No. NCT02854605).

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Hepatology

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Cilofexor, a Nonsteroidal FXR Agonist, in Patients With Noncirrhotic NASH: A Phase 2 Randomized Controlled Trial'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this