TY - JOUR
T1 - Circulating Tumor DNA Markers for Early Progression on Fulvestrant with or without Palbociclib in ER+ Advanced Breast Cancer
AU - O'leary, Ben
AU - Cutts, Rosalind J.
AU - Huang, Xin
AU - Hrebien, Sarah
AU - Liu, Yuan
AU - André, Fabrice
AU - Loibl, Sibylle
AU - Loi, Sherene
AU - Garcia-Murillas, Isaac
AU - Cristofanilli, Massimo
AU - Bartlett, Cynthia Huang
AU - Turner, Nicholas C.
N1 - Funding Information:
This work was supported by the Medical Research Council (MR/N002121/1), Breast Cancer Now with support from the Mary-Jean Mitchell Green Foundation and Pfizer. We acknowledge National Institute for Health Research funding to the Royal Marsden and Institute of Cancer Research Biomedical Research Centre. We thank Breast Cancer Now for funding this work as part of Program Funding to the Breast Cancer Now Toby Robins Research Centre.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2020 The Author(s).
PY - 2021/3/1
Y1 - 2021/3/1
N2 - Background: There are no established molecular biomarkers for patients with breast cancer receiving combination endocrine and CDK4/6 inhibitor (CDK4/6i). We aimed to determine whether genomic markers in circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) can identify patients at higher risk of early progression on fulvestrant therapy with or without palbociclib, a CDK4/6i. Methods: PALOMA-3 was a phase III, multicenter, double-blind randomized controlled trial of palbociclib plus fulvestrant (n = 347) vs placebo plus fulvestrant (n = 174) in patients with endocrine-pretreated estrogen receptor-positive (ER+) breast cancer. Pretreatment plasma samples from 459 patients were analyzed for mutations in 17 genes, copy number in 14 genes, and circulating tumor fraction. Progression-free survival (PFS) was compared in patients with circulating tumor fraction above or below a prespecified cutoff of 10% and with or without a specific genomic alteration. All statistical tests were 2-sided. Results: Patients with high ctDNA fraction had worse PFS on both palbociclib plus fulvestrant (hazard ratio [HR] = 1.62, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.17 to 2.24; P =. 004) and placebo plus fulvestrant (HR = 1.77, 95% CI = 1.21 to 2.59; P =. 004). In multivariable analysis, high-circulating tumor fraction was associated with worse PFS (HR = 1.20 per 10% increase in tumor fraction, 95% CI = 1.09 to 1.32; P <. 001), as was TP53 mutation (HR = 1.84, 95% CI = 1.27 to 2.65; P =. 001) and FGFR1 amplification (HR = 2.91, 95% CI = 1.61 to 5.25; P <. 001). No interaction with treatment randomization was observed. Conclusions: Pretreatment ctDNA identified a group of high-risk patients with poor clinical outcome despite the addition of CDK4/6 inhibition. These patients might benefit from inclusion in future trials of escalating treatment, with therapies that may be active in these genomic contexts.
AB - Background: There are no established molecular biomarkers for patients with breast cancer receiving combination endocrine and CDK4/6 inhibitor (CDK4/6i). We aimed to determine whether genomic markers in circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) can identify patients at higher risk of early progression on fulvestrant therapy with or without palbociclib, a CDK4/6i. Methods: PALOMA-3 was a phase III, multicenter, double-blind randomized controlled trial of palbociclib plus fulvestrant (n = 347) vs placebo plus fulvestrant (n = 174) in patients with endocrine-pretreated estrogen receptor-positive (ER+) breast cancer. Pretreatment plasma samples from 459 patients were analyzed for mutations in 17 genes, copy number in 14 genes, and circulating tumor fraction. Progression-free survival (PFS) was compared in patients with circulating tumor fraction above or below a prespecified cutoff of 10% and with or without a specific genomic alteration. All statistical tests were 2-sided. Results: Patients with high ctDNA fraction had worse PFS on both palbociclib plus fulvestrant (hazard ratio [HR] = 1.62, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.17 to 2.24; P =. 004) and placebo plus fulvestrant (HR = 1.77, 95% CI = 1.21 to 2.59; P =. 004). In multivariable analysis, high-circulating tumor fraction was associated with worse PFS (HR = 1.20 per 10% increase in tumor fraction, 95% CI = 1.09 to 1.32; P <. 001), as was TP53 mutation (HR = 1.84, 95% CI = 1.27 to 2.65; P =. 001) and FGFR1 amplification (HR = 2.91, 95% CI = 1.61 to 5.25; P <. 001). No interaction with treatment randomization was observed. Conclusions: Pretreatment ctDNA identified a group of high-risk patients with poor clinical outcome despite the addition of CDK4/6 inhibition. These patients might benefit from inclusion in future trials of escalating treatment, with therapies that may be active in these genomic contexts.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85102657361&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85102657361&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1093/jnci/djaa087
DO - 10.1093/jnci/djaa087
M3 - Article
C2 - 32940689
AN - SCOPUS:85102657361
SN - 0027-8874
VL - 113
SP - 309
EP - 317
JO - Journal of the National Cancer Institute
JF - Journal of the National Cancer Institute
IS - 3
ER -