TY - JOUR
T1 - Citation to legislative history
T2 - Empirical evidence on positive political and contextual theories of judicial decision making
AU - Abramowicz, Michael
AU - Tiller, Emerson H.
PY - 2009/6
Y1 - 2009/6
N2 - We present empirical evidence suggesting that political context-judicial hierarchy and judicial panel dynamics-influences an authoring judge's use of legislative history. Specifically, we find that to the extent that political ideology matters, a district court judge's choice of legislative history is influenced, albeit modestly, by (1) the political makeup of the overseeing circuit court and (2) the political characteristics of a judge's panel colleagues, as well as by the circuit court as a whole. These factors matter more than the authoring judge's own political-ideological connection to the legislators. Put differently, an authoring judge will have a greater tendency to cite legislative history by legislators who share political party affiliation with the colleagues and superiors of the authoring judge than legislators sharing the same political party affiliation as the authoring judge himself. These findings are consistent generally with positive political and contextual theories of judicial persuasion, collegiality, and strategic decision making.
AB - We present empirical evidence suggesting that political context-judicial hierarchy and judicial panel dynamics-influences an authoring judge's use of legislative history. Specifically, we find that to the extent that political ideology matters, a district court judge's choice of legislative history is influenced, albeit modestly, by (1) the political makeup of the overseeing circuit court and (2) the political characteristics of a judge's panel colleagues, as well as by the circuit court as a whole. These factors matter more than the authoring judge's own political-ideological connection to the legislators. Put differently, an authoring judge will have a greater tendency to cite legislative history by legislators who share political party affiliation with the colleagues and superiors of the authoring judge than legislators sharing the same political party affiliation as the authoring judge himself. These findings are consistent generally with positive political and contextual theories of judicial persuasion, collegiality, and strategic decision making.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=70349554581&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=70349554581&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1086/598617
DO - 10.1086/598617
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:70349554581
SN - 0047-2530
VL - 38
SP - 419
EP - 443
JO - Journal of Legal Studies
JF - Journal of Legal Studies
IS - 2
ER -