TY - JOUR
T1 - Clinical appearance of full-thickness skin grafts of the nose
AU - Silapunt, Sirunya
AU - Peterson, S. Ray
AU - Alam, Murad
AU - Goldberg, Leonard H.
N1 - Copyright:
Copyright 2017 Elsevier B.V., All rights reserved.
PY - 2005/2
Y1 - 2005/2
N2 - BACKGROUND: Full-thickness skin grafting (FTSG) is an option for reconstruction of nasal defects. OBJECTIVE: To correlate the clinical outcome of FTSG on the nose with donor site, location of the defect, and defect size. METHODS: Patients with FTSG on the nose following Mohs' micrographic surgery were enrolled. Clinical and photographic assessments were performed. RESULTS: There were 54 FTSGs; the mean age was 20.6 months, and the average size was 2.1 cm2. The clinical assessment score was significantly different across donor sites, with dog-ear skin providing the best results, followed, respectively, by conchal bowl, preauricular, postauricular, and inner arm skin (p = .006). The global clinical outcome determined from the clinical assessment score was good for inner arm skin and excellent for other sites. The photographic assessment score was not different among donor sites (p = .601). There was no correlation of location and size of the defect to the clinical outcome assessed clinically and photographically (p > .05). CONCLUSION: All potential donor sites should be considered to select the donor site that best matches the defect.
AB - BACKGROUND: Full-thickness skin grafting (FTSG) is an option for reconstruction of nasal defects. OBJECTIVE: To correlate the clinical outcome of FTSG on the nose with donor site, location of the defect, and defect size. METHODS: Patients with FTSG on the nose following Mohs' micrographic surgery were enrolled. Clinical and photographic assessments were performed. RESULTS: There were 54 FTSGs; the mean age was 20.6 months, and the average size was 2.1 cm2. The clinical assessment score was significantly different across donor sites, with dog-ear skin providing the best results, followed, respectively, by conchal bowl, preauricular, postauricular, and inner arm skin (p = .006). The global clinical outcome determined from the clinical assessment score was good for inner arm skin and excellent for other sites. The photographic assessment score was not different among donor sites (p = .601). There was no correlation of location and size of the defect to the clinical outcome assessed clinically and photographically (p > .05). CONCLUSION: All potential donor sites should be considered to select the donor site that best matches the defect.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=15044358861&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=15044358861&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1097/00042728-200502000-00011
DO - 10.1097/00042728-200502000-00011
M3 - Article
C2 - 15762211
AN - SCOPUS:15044358861
SN - 1076-0512
VL - 31
SP - 177
EP - 183
JO - Journal of Dermatologic Surgery and Oncology
JF - Journal of Dermatologic Surgery and Oncology
IS - 2
ER -