Clinical application of a robotic ankle training program for cerebral palsy compared to the research laboratory application: Does it translate to practice?

Theresa Sukal-Moulton, Theresa Clancy, Li Qun Zhang, Deborah Gaebler-Spira

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

  • 14 Citations

Abstract

Objective To determine the clinical efficacy of an ankle robotic rehabilitation protocol for patients with cerebral palsy. Design The clinic cohort was identified from a retrospective chart review in a before-after intervention trial design and compared with a previously published prospective research cohort. Setting Rehabilitation hospital. Participants Children (N=28; mean age, 8.2±3.62y) with Gross Motor Function Classification System levels I, II, or III who were referred for ankle stretching and strengthening used a robotic ankle device in a clinic setting. Clinic results were compared with a previously published cohort of participants (N=12; mean age, 7.8±2.91y) seen in a research laboratory-based intervention protocol. Interventions Patients in the clinic cohort were seen 2 times per week for 75-minute sessions for a total of 6 weeks. The first 30 minutes of the session were spent using the robotic ankle device for ankle stretching and strengthening, and the remaining 45 minutes were spent on functional movement activities. There was no control group. Main Outcome Measures We compared pre- and postintervention measures of plantarflexor and dorsiflexor range of motion, strength, spasticity, mobility (Timed Up and Go test, 6-minute walk test, 10-m walk test), balance (Pediatric Balance Scale), Selective Control Assessment of the Lower Extremity (SCALE), and gross motor function measure (GMFM). Results Significant improvements were found for the clinic cohort in all main outcome measures except for the GMFM. These improvements were equivalent to those reported in the research cohort, except for larger SCALE test changes in the research cohort. Conclusions These findings suggest that translation of repetitive, goal-directed biofeedback training into the clinic setting is both feasible and beneficial for patients with cerebral palsy.

LanguageEnglish (US)
Pages1433-1440
Number of pages8
JournalArchives of physical medicine and rehabilitation
Volume95
Issue number8
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2014

Fingerprint

Robotics
Cerebral Palsy
Ankle
Education
Research
Lower Extremity
Rehabilitation
Outcome Assessment (Health Care)
Equipment and Supplies
Articular Range of Motion
Pediatrics
Control Groups
Walk Test

Keywords

  • Ankle
  • Cerebral palsy
  • Exercise
  • Rehabilitation
  • Resistance training
  • Robotics

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation
  • Rehabilitation

Cite this

@article{f39ade701b704cec87a743627c81f486,
title = "Clinical application of a robotic ankle training program for cerebral palsy compared to the research laboratory application: Does it translate to practice?",
abstract = "Objective To determine the clinical efficacy of an ankle robotic rehabilitation protocol for patients with cerebral palsy. Design The clinic cohort was identified from a retrospective chart review in a before-after intervention trial design and compared with a previously published prospective research cohort. Setting Rehabilitation hospital. Participants Children (N=28; mean age, 8.2±3.62y) with Gross Motor Function Classification System levels I, II, or III who were referred for ankle stretching and strengthening used a robotic ankle device in a clinic setting. Clinic results were compared with a previously published cohort of participants (N=12; mean age, 7.8±2.91y) seen in a research laboratory-based intervention protocol. Interventions Patients in the clinic cohort were seen 2 times per week for 75-minute sessions for a total of 6 weeks. The first 30 minutes of the session were spent using the robotic ankle device for ankle stretching and strengthening, and the remaining 45 minutes were spent on functional movement activities. There was no control group. Main Outcome Measures We compared pre- and postintervention measures of plantarflexor and dorsiflexor range of motion, strength, spasticity, mobility (Timed Up and Go test, 6-minute walk test, 10-m walk test), balance (Pediatric Balance Scale), Selective Control Assessment of the Lower Extremity (SCALE), and gross motor function measure (GMFM). Results Significant improvements were found for the clinic cohort in all main outcome measures except for the GMFM. These improvements were equivalent to those reported in the research cohort, except for larger SCALE test changes in the research cohort. Conclusions These findings suggest that translation of repetitive, goal-directed biofeedback training into the clinic setting is both feasible and beneficial for patients with cerebral palsy.",
keywords = "Ankle, Cerebral palsy, Exercise, Rehabilitation, Resistance training, Robotics",
author = "Theresa Sukal-Moulton and Theresa Clancy and Zhang, {Li Qun} and Deborah Gaebler-Spira",
year = "2014",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.apmr.2014.04.010",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "95",
pages = "1433--1440",
journal = "Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation",
issn = "0003-9993",
publisher = "W.B. Saunders Ltd",
number = "8",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Clinical application of a robotic ankle training program for cerebral palsy compared to the research laboratory application

T2 - Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation

AU - Sukal-Moulton, Theresa

AU - Clancy, Theresa

AU - Zhang, Li Qun

AU - Gaebler-Spira, Deborah

PY - 2014/1/1

Y1 - 2014/1/1

N2 - Objective To determine the clinical efficacy of an ankle robotic rehabilitation protocol for patients with cerebral palsy. Design The clinic cohort was identified from a retrospective chart review in a before-after intervention trial design and compared with a previously published prospective research cohort. Setting Rehabilitation hospital. Participants Children (N=28; mean age, 8.2±3.62y) with Gross Motor Function Classification System levels I, II, or III who were referred for ankle stretching and strengthening used a robotic ankle device in a clinic setting. Clinic results were compared with a previously published cohort of participants (N=12; mean age, 7.8±2.91y) seen in a research laboratory-based intervention protocol. Interventions Patients in the clinic cohort were seen 2 times per week for 75-minute sessions for a total of 6 weeks. The first 30 minutes of the session were spent using the robotic ankle device for ankle stretching and strengthening, and the remaining 45 minutes were spent on functional movement activities. There was no control group. Main Outcome Measures We compared pre- and postintervention measures of plantarflexor and dorsiflexor range of motion, strength, spasticity, mobility (Timed Up and Go test, 6-minute walk test, 10-m walk test), balance (Pediatric Balance Scale), Selective Control Assessment of the Lower Extremity (SCALE), and gross motor function measure (GMFM). Results Significant improvements were found for the clinic cohort in all main outcome measures except for the GMFM. These improvements were equivalent to those reported in the research cohort, except for larger SCALE test changes in the research cohort. Conclusions These findings suggest that translation of repetitive, goal-directed biofeedback training into the clinic setting is both feasible and beneficial for patients with cerebral palsy.

AB - Objective To determine the clinical efficacy of an ankle robotic rehabilitation protocol for patients with cerebral palsy. Design The clinic cohort was identified from a retrospective chart review in a before-after intervention trial design and compared with a previously published prospective research cohort. Setting Rehabilitation hospital. Participants Children (N=28; mean age, 8.2±3.62y) with Gross Motor Function Classification System levels I, II, or III who were referred for ankle stretching and strengthening used a robotic ankle device in a clinic setting. Clinic results were compared with a previously published cohort of participants (N=12; mean age, 7.8±2.91y) seen in a research laboratory-based intervention protocol. Interventions Patients in the clinic cohort were seen 2 times per week for 75-minute sessions for a total of 6 weeks. The first 30 minutes of the session were spent using the robotic ankle device for ankle stretching and strengthening, and the remaining 45 minutes were spent on functional movement activities. There was no control group. Main Outcome Measures We compared pre- and postintervention measures of plantarflexor and dorsiflexor range of motion, strength, spasticity, mobility (Timed Up and Go test, 6-minute walk test, 10-m walk test), balance (Pediatric Balance Scale), Selective Control Assessment of the Lower Extremity (SCALE), and gross motor function measure (GMFM). Results Significant improvements were found for the clinic cohort in all main outcome measures except for the GMFM. These improvements were equivalent to those reported in the research cohort, except for larger SCALE test changes in the research cohort. Conclusions These findings suggest that translation of repetitive, goal-directed biofeedback training into the clinic setting is both feasible and beneficial for patients with cerebral palsy.

KW - Ankle

KW - Cerebral palsy

KW - Exercise

KW - Rehabilitation

KW - Resistance training

KW - Robotics

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84905104074&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84905104074&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.apmr.2014.04.010

DO - 10.1016/j.apmr.2014.04.010

M3 - Article

VL - 95

SP - 1433

EP - 1440

JO - Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation

JF - Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation

SN - 0003-9993

IS - 8

ER -