TY - JOUR
T1 - Clinical results of patients with subaxial cervical spine trauma treated according to the SLIC score
AU - Joaquim, Andrei F.
AU - Ghizoni, Enrico
AU - Tedeschi, Helder
AU - Da Cruz, Halisson Y.F.
AU - Patel, Alpesh A.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2014 The Academy of Spinal Cord Injury Professionals, Inc.
PY - 2014/7/1
Y1 - 2014/7/1
N2 - Objective: The Subaxial Injury Classification (SLIC) system has been developed to improve injury classification and guide surgical decision making yet clinical validation remains necessary. Methods: We evaluated the validity and safety of the SLIC system prospectively in patients treated for subaxial cervical spine trauma (SCST) between 2009 and 2012. Patients with four or more points were surgically treated, whereas patients with less than 4 points were conservatively managed. Outcome measures: Neurological status was assessed as the primary outcome of successful treatment. Results: Non-surgical group - Twenty-three patients were treated non-surgically, 14 (61%) of them with some follow-up at our institution. Follow-up ranged from 3 to 5 months (mean of 4.42; median 4). The SLIC score ranged from 0 to 6 points (mean and median of 1). One patient with a SLIC of 6 points refused surgery. Surgical group: Twenty-five patients were operated, but follow-up after hospital discharge was obtained in 23 (92%) patients (range from 1 to 24 months, mean of 5.82 months). The SLIC score in this group ranged from 4 to 9 points (mean and median of 7). No patients had neurological worsening. Eight of 13 patients with incomplete deficits had some improvement in American Spinal Injury Association score. Conclusions: This is the first prospective application of the SLIC system. With regard to our primary outcome, neurological status, the SLIC system was found to be a safe and effective guide in the surgical treatment of SCST.
AB - Objective: The Subaxial Injury Classification (SLIC) system has been developed to improve injury classification and guide surgical decision making yet clinical validation remains necessary. Methods: We evaluated the validity and safety of the SLIC system prospectively in patients treated for subaxial cervical spine trauma (SCST) between 2009 and 2012. Patients with four or more points were surgically treated, whereas patients with less than 4 points were conservatively managed. Outcome measures: Neurological status was assessed as the primary outcome of successful treatment. Results: Non-surgical group - Twenty-three patients were treated non-surgically, 14 (61%) of them with some follow-up at our institution. Follow-up ranged from 3 to 5 months (mean of 4.42; median 4). The SLIC score ranged from 0 to 6 points (mean and median of 1). One patient with a SLIC of 6 points refused surgery. Surgical group: Twenty-five patients were operated, but follow-up after hospital discharge was obtained in 23 (92%) patients (range from 1 to 24 months, mean of 5.82 months). The SLIC score in this group ranged from 4 to 9 points (mean and median of 7). No patients had neurological worsening. Eight of 13 patients with incomplete deficits had some improvement in American Spinal Injury Association score. Conclusions: This is the first prospective application of the SLIC system. With regard to our primary outcome, neurological status, the SLIC system was found to be a safe and effective guide in the surgical treatment of SCST.
KW - SLIC
KW - Spinal cord injuries
KW - Subaxial cervical spine trauma
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84907230133&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84907230133&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1179/2045772313Y.0000000143
DO - 10.1179/2045772313Y.0000000143
M3 - Article
C2 - 24090539
AN - SCOPUS:84907230133
SN - 1079-0268
VL - 37
SP - 420
EP - 424
JO - Journal of Spinal Cord Medicine
JF - Journal of Spinal Cord Medicine
IS - 4
ER -