Clinical Stage Migration and Survival for Renal Cell Carcinoma in the United States

Hiten D. Patel*, Mohit Gupta, Gregory A. Joice, Arnav Srivastava, Ridwan Alam, Mohamad E. Allaf, Phillip M. Pierorazio

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

96 Scopus citations

Abstract

Background: The rising incidence of renal cell carcinoma (RCC) since the 1980s has been accompanied by stage migration toward early-stage (stage I) cancers. Stage migration drove an apparent increase in survival for RCC since the 1980s, but it is unclear whether it remains a contributor more recently. Objective: To determine whether clinical stage migration has persisted and the relative impact of stage migration versus improvements in treatment on survival for RCC. Design, setting, and participants: An epidemiologic assessment of stage migration and survival for 262 597 patients at diagnosis of RCC (2004–2015) across >1500 facilities in the National Cancer Database. Outcome measurements and statistical analysis: Proportion of patients over time was assessed by clinical stage at diagnosis via Cochran-Armitage chi-square tests and linear regression. Mortality data were assessed with the Kaplan-Meier method for 5-yr overall survival, Cox proportional hazards regression, and propensity score matching to differentiate the impact of treatment including systemic therapy from stage migration. Results and limitations: Greater diagnosis of clinical stage I disease (70%; p < 0.001) was observed, with decreased diagnosis of stage III (8%; p < 0.001) and stage IV (11%; p < 0.001) up to 2007 followed by stabilization through 2015. Tumor size continues to decrease for localized tumors (mean–0.22 cm stage I and–1.24 cm stage II, 2004–2015). Histology demonstrated significant associations with stage. Five-year overall survival improved (67.9% [2004] to 72.3% [2010]) with gains in advanced RCC but not localized tumors. Models confirmed improved survival in recent years for stage IV patients. Systemic therapy was associated with improved survival (hazard ratio 0.811 [0.786–0.837], p < 0.001). National Cancer Database limitations apply. Conclusions: The proportion of patients presenting with stage I RCC has stabilized (70%), suggesting that stage migration may have ended. Localized tumors are detected with decreasing size, while advanced cancers have remained stable. Only 11% of patients now present with distant metastatic disease, but 5-yr overall survival is improving in recent years due to improved treatments rather than stage migration. Patient summary: In this study, we found that stage migration toward early-stage cancers has ended for renal cell carcinoma (RCC). However, improved treatment for advanced RCC appears to be responsible for improved survival in recent years.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)343-348
Number of pages6
JournalEuropean Urology Oncology
Volume2
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Jul 2019

Keywords

  • Kidney cancer
  • Renal cell carcinoma
  • Small renal mass
  • Stage migration

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • General Medicine

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Clinical Stage Migration and Survival for Renal Cell Carcinoma in the United States'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this