Abstract
Background Operating room (OR) to the intensive care unit (ICU) handoffs are known sources of medical error, yet little is known about the relationship between process failures and patient harm. Methods Interviews were conducted with clinicians involved in the OR-to-ICU handoff to characterize the relationship between handoff process failures and patient harm. Qualitative analysis was used to inductively identify key themes. Results A total of 38 interviews were conducted. Dominant themes included early communication from the OR to the ICU, team member participation in the handoff, and relationships between clinicians; clinician perspectives varied depending substantially on role within the team. Conclusions The findings suggest that ambiguous roles and conflicting expectations of team members during the OR-to-ICU handoff can increase risk of patient harm. Future studies should investigate early postoperative ICU care as outcome markers of handoff quality and the effect of interprofessional education on clinician adherence to interventions.
Original language | English (US) |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 629-635 |
Number of pages | 7 |
Journal | American journal of surgery |
Volume | 210 |
Issue number | 4 |
DOIs | |
State | Published - Oct 1 2015 |
Funding
This work is funded by Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality and National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases T32 Training Grants (McElroy 5T32HS000078-15 , T32DK077662 ).
Keywords
- Critical care
- Patient handoff
- Patient safety
- Qualitative methods
- Quality improvement
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Surgery