Colorectal cancer screening rates at community health centers that use electronic health records: A cross sectional study

David W. Baker*, David T. Liss, Kari Alperovitz-Bichell, Tiffany Brown, Joseph E. Carroll, Phil Crawford, Padmini Harigopal, Eric Henley, Christine A. Nelson, Sarah S. Rittner

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

15 Scopus citations

Abstract

Background. This study was conducted to validate use of electronic health record (EHR) data for measuring colorectal cancer (CRC) screening rates at community health centers (CHCs). Methods. Electronic health records were queried to assess screening via colonoscopy, flexible sigmoidoscopy, or fecal occult blood testing (FOBT) in 2011. Results. Multiple iterations were required to maximize query accuracy. Manual chart reviews, stratified by screening modality, confirmed query results for 112 of 113 (99.1%) reviewed colonoscopies, 110 of 110 (100%) reviewed FOBTs, and 111 of 120 (92.5%) unscreened patients. At participating CHCs, CRC screening rates ranged from 9.7% to 67.2% (median, 30.6%). Adherence to annual FOBT ranged from 3.3% to 59.0% (median, 18.6%). Most screening was done by colonoscopy. Conclusions. Colorectal cancer screening varies substantially across CHCs. Electronic health record data can validly measure CRC screening, but repeated assessments of programming accuracy are required. Community health centers may need support to measure quality using EHR data and increase screening.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)377-390
Number of pages14
JournalJournal of health care for the poor and underserved
Volume26
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - 2015

Keywords

  • Colorectal cancer screening
  • Community health centers
  • Electronic health records
  • Health care disparities
  • Preventive medicine

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Colorectal cancer screening rates at community health centers that use electronic health records: A cross sectional study'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this