Commentary

Accurate medical student performance evaluations and professionalism assessment: "yes, we can!"

Marianne Green*, Amanda Zick, John X Thomas

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

5 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

In this issue, Brenner and colleagues report a correlation between the frequency of negative comments in the "dean's letter" and future problems during a psychiatry residency program. Their study makes an important contribution to the body of literature on factors that predict professionalism-related performance issues during residency and suggests the importance of dependable data that can be used to predict and hopefully intervene early in the training of future physicians across all specialties. As we think about the implications of this study, important issues involving the standardization of medical student performance evaluations (MSPEs) and the assessment of professionalism are raised. Despite the Association of American Medical Colleges' 2002 guidelines for MSPEs, subsequent studies have revealed that considerable inconsistencies among the evaluations still remain. To enhance the accuracy and usefulness of the MSPEs in predicting "problem residents," improved standardization is necessary. Moreover, Brenner's findings call for the development of more vigorous assessment of professionalism in undergraduate medical education, as well as more accurate reporting of these assessments to residency programs. Longitudinal assessment of professionalism with robust tools allows for the identification and possible remediation of students early in their undergraduate training. Insofar as unprofessional behavior in medical school is predictive not only of problems during residency but also of later disciplinary action against the practicing physician by state medical boards, it is the obligation of the medical school to the residency program and to society to identify and report these behaviors.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1105-1107
Number of pages3
JournalAcademic Medicine
Volume85
Issue number7
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2010

Fingerprint

Internship and Residency
Medical Students
medical student
evaluation
performance
Medical Schools
physician
Professional Misconduct
Undergraduate Medical Education
Physicians
psychiatry
school
American Medical Association
obligation
Psychiatry
resident
Professionalism
professionalism
Guidelines
Students

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Medicine(all)
  • Education

Cite this

@article{ef976e64f3464cc5a7b4f7b9f089c0bb,
title = "Commentary: Accurate medical student performance evaluations and professionalism assessment: {"}yes, we can!{"}",
abstract = "In this issue, Brenner and colleagues report a correlation between the frequency of negative comments in the {"}dean's letter{"} and future problems during a psychiatry residency program. Their study makes an important contribution to the body of literature on factors that predict professionalism-related performance issues during residency and suggests the importance of dependable data that can be used to predict and hopefully intervene early in the training of future physicians across all specialties. As we think about the implications of this study, important issues involving the standardization of medical student performance evaluations (MSPEs) and the assessment of professionalism are raised. Despite the Association of American Medical Colleges' 2002 guidelines for MSPEs, subsequent studies have revealed that considerable inconsistencies among the evaluations still remain. To enhance the accuracy and usefulness of the MSPEs in predicting {"}problem residents,{"} improved standardization is necessary. Moreover, Brenner's findings call for the development of more vigorous assessment of professionalism in undergraduate medical education, as well as more accurate reporting of these assessments to residency programs. Longitudinal assessment of professionalism with robust tools allows for the identification and possible remediation of students early in their undergraduate training. Insofar as unprofessional behavior in medical school is predictive not only of problems during residency but also of later disciplinary action against the practicing physician by state medical boards, it is the obligation of the medical school to the residency program and to society to identify and report these behaviors.",
author = "Marianne Green and Amanda Zick and Thomas, {John X}",
year = "2010",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1097/ACM.0b013e3181e208c5",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "85",
pages = "1105--1107",
journal = "Academic Medicine",
issn = "1040-2446",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "7",

}

Commentary : Accurate medical student performance evaluations and professionalism assessment: "yes, we can!". / Green, Marianne; Zick, Amanda; Thomas, John X.

In: Academic Medicine, Vol. 85, No. 7, 01.01.2010, p. 1105-1107.

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

TY - JOUR

T1 - Commentary

T2 - Accurate medical student performance evaluations and professionalism assessment: "yes, we can!"

AU - Green, Marianne

AU - Zick, Amanda

AU - Thomas, John X

PY - 2010/1/1

Y1 - 2010/1/1

N2 - In this issue, Brenner and colleagues report a correlation between the frequency of negative comments in the "dean's letter" and future problems during a psychiatry residency program. Their study makes an important contribution to the body of literature on factors that predict professionalism-related performance issues during residency and suggests the importance of dependable data that can be used to predict and hopefully intervene early in the training of future physicians across all specialties. As we think about the implications of this study, important issues involving the standardization of medical student performance evaluations (MSPEs) and the assessment of professionalism are raised. Despite the Association of American Medical Colleges' 2002 guidelines for MSPEs, subsequent studies have revealed that considerable inconsistencies among the evaluations still remain. To enhance the accuracy and usefulness of the MSPEs in predicting "problem residents," improved standardization is necessary. Moreover, Brenner's findings call for the development of more vigorous assessment of professionalism in undergraduate medical education, as well as more accurate reporting of these assessments to residency programs. Longitudinal assessment of professionalism with robust tools allows for the identification and possible remediation of students early in their undergraduate training. Insofar as unprofessional behavior in medical school is predictive not only of problems during residency but also of later disciplinary action against the practicing physician by state medical boards, it is the obligation of the medical school to the residency program and to society to identify and report these behaviors.

AB - In this issue, Brenner and colleagues report a correlation between the frequency of negative comments in the "dean's letter" and future problems during a psychiatry residency program. Their study makes an important contribution to the body of literature on factors that predict professionalism-related performance issues during residency and suggests the importance of dependable data that can be used to predict and hopefully intervene early in the training of future physicians across all specialties. As we think about the implications of this study, important issues involving the standardization of medical student performance evaluations (MSPEs) and the assessment of professionalism are raised. Despite the Association of American Medical Colleges' 2002 guidelines for MSPEs, subsequent studies have revealed that considerable inconsistencies among the evaluations still remain. To enhance the accuracy and usefulness of the MSPEs in predicting "problem residents," improved standardization is necessary. Moreover, Brenner's findings call for the development of more vigorous assessment of professionalism in undergraduate medical education, as well as more accurate reporting of these assessments to residency programs. Longitudinal assessment of professionalism with robust tools allows for the identification and possible remediation of students early in their undergraduate training. Insofar as unprofessional behavior in medical school is predictive not only of problems during residency but also of later disciplinary action against the practicing physician by state medical boards, it is the obligation of the medical school to the residency program and to society to identify and report these behaviors.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=77954921905&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=77954921905&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1097/ACM.0b013e3181e208c5

DO - 10.1097/ACM.0b013e3181e208c5

M3 - Review article

VL - 85

SP - 1105

EP - 1107

JO - Academic Medicine

JF - Academic Medicine

SN - 1040-2446

IS - 7

ER -