Commentary on “Do Vaping Prevention Messages Impact Adolescents and Young Adults? A Meta-Analysis of Experimental Studies”

Daniel J. O’Keefe*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalComment/debatepeer-review

2 Scopus citations

Abstract

Preventing vaping by adolescents and young adults is unquestionably an important goal. Ma et al.’s meta-analysis invites the conclusion that vaping prevention messages are effective. This commentary discusses two concerns about that conclusion and the affiliated meta-analysis: (1) None of the analyzed effect sizes describes the effectiveness of vaping prevention messages; the effect sizes describe the difference in effectiveness (the difference on an outcome variable) between the two conditions being compared. (2) As the two conditions being compared vary, so do the relevant conclusions–—but the review combines different kinds of comparisons.

Original languageEnglish (US)
JournalHealth communication
DOIs
StateAccepted/In press - 2023

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Health(social science)
  • Communication

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Commentary on “Do Vaping Prevention Messages Impact Adolescents and Young Adults? A Meta-Analysis of Experimental Studies”'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this