Commentary: Shifting the focus of physician assessment in the United States

Kevin B. Weiss*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

2 Scopus citations


There is a substantial international body of research that supports the value of the use of multisource feedback (MSF) for physician performance assessment. In this issue, Wright and colleagues add to this body of literature by examining two instruments designed to collect MSF from large cohorts of patients and colleagues in the context of physician performance evaluation in the United Kingdom. In the United States there is a reticence by leading physician organizations to adopt the use of patient and peer feedback in key evaluations such as maintenance of specialty board certification or licensure. This commentary explores this incongruity in light of the 50th anniversary of Thomas Kuhn's seminal work, The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. It is concluded that, although the paradigm of using patient and peer evaluation in the United States appears to be shifting, the profession, by way of not providing MSF to the public, is losing its role in being the unique provider of public information on physician performance.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1660-1661
Number of pages2
JournalAcademic Medicine
Issue number12
StatePublished - Dec 2012

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Education


Dive into the research topics of 'Commentary: Shifting the focus of physician assessment in the United States'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this