TY - JOUR
T1 - Community health worker intervention to decrease cervical cancer disparities in Hispanic women
AU - O'Brien, Matthew J.
AU - Halbert, Chanita Hughes
AU - Bixby, Rebecca
AU - Pimentel, Susana
AU - Shea, Judy A.
N1 - Funding Information:
Acknowledgments: The authors thank the promotoras whose work is the subject of this article, and whose dedication to this study has been essential to its success. Their names are Susana Pimentel, Irma Zamora, Bertha Gonzalez, and Guadalupe Canchola. The authors would like to thank Giselle Dutcher and Darryl Powell for their help in the implementation of this study. We also thank Dr. Steven Larson for helping conceptualize and develop our community health worker program. We acknowledge our community partners involved in the design and ongoing implementation of the study: Puentes de Salud Health Center, the Mexican Consulate of Philadelphia, the Catholic Archdiocese of Philadelphia, and Juntos Mexica-nos. The current study was supported by Grant Number UL1RR024134 from the National Center for Research Resources. The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the National Center for Research Resources or the National Institutes of Health. This paper was presented at the SGIM 33rd Annual Meeting in April 2010.
PY - 2010/11
Y1 - 2010/11
N2 - INTRODUCTION: U.S. Hispanic women suffer a disproportionate burden of cervical cancer, with incidence and mortality rates almost twice that of whites. Community health workers, or promotoras, are considered a potential strategy for eliminating such racial and ethnic health disparities. The current study is a randomized trial of a promotora-led educational intervention focused on cervical cancer in a local Hispanic community. METHODS: Four promotoras led a series of two workshops with community members covering content related to cervical cancer. Sociodemographic characteristics, cervical cancer risk, previous screening history, cervical cancer knowledge, and self-efficacy were measured by a pre-intervention questionnaire. The post-intervention questionnaire measured the following outcomes: cervical cancer knowledge (on a 0-6 scale), self-efficacy (on a 0-5 scale), and receipt of Pap smear screening during the previous 6 months (dichotomous). Univariate analyses were performed using chi square, t-test, and the Mann-Whitney test. Multivariate logistic regression was used to model the association between explanatory variables and receipt of Pap smear screening. RESULTS: There were no statistically significant differences between the two experimental groups at baseline. Follow-up data revealed significant improvements in all outcome measures: Pap smear screening (65% vs. 36%, p-value 0.02), cervical cancer knowledge (5.4 vs. 3.5, pvalue< 0.001), and self-efficacy (4.7 vs. 4.0, p-value 0.002). In multivariate analysis, cervical cancer knowledge (OR 1.68, 95% CI 1.10-2.81) and intervention group assignment (OR 6.74, 95% CI 1.77-25.66) were associated with receiving a Pap smear during the followup period. DISCUSSION: Our randomized trial of a promotora-led educational intervention demonstrated improved Pap screening rates, in addition to increased knowledge about cervical cancer and self-efficacy. The observed association between cervical cancer knowledge and Pap smear receipt underscores the importance of educating vulnerable populations about the diseases that disproportionately affect them. Future research should evaluate such programs on a larger scale, and identify novel targets for intervention.
AB - INTRODUCTION: U.S. Hispanic women suffer a disproportionate burden of cervical cancer, with incidence and mortality rates almost twice that of whites. Community health workers, or promotoras, are considered a potential strategy for eliminating such racial and ethnic health disparities. The current study is a randomized trial of a promotora-led educational intervention focused on cervical cancer in a local Hispanic community. METHODS: Four promotoras led a series of two workshops with community members covering content related to cervical cancer. Sociodemographic characteristics, cervical cancer risk, previous screening history, cervical cancer knowledge, and self-efficacy were measured by a pre-intervention questionnaire. The post-intervention questionnaire measured the following outcomes: cervical cancer knowledge (on a 0-6 scale), self-efficacy (on a 0-5 scale), and receipt of Pap smear screening during the previous 6 months (dichotomous). Univariate analyses were performed using chi square, t-test, and the Mann-Whitney test. Multivariate logistic regression was used to model the association between explanatory variables and receipt of Pap smear screening. RESULTS: There were no statistically significant differences between the two experimental groups at baseline. Follow-up data revealed significant improvements in all outcome measures: Pap smear screening (65% vs. 36%, p-value 0.02), cervical cancer knowledge (5.4 vs. 3.5, pvalue< 0.001), and self-efficacy (4.7 vs. 4.0, p-value 0.002). In multivariate analysis, cervical cancer knowledge (OR 1.68, 95% CI 1.10-2.81) and intervention group assignment (OR 6.74, 95% CI 1.77-25.66) were associated with receiving a Pap smear during the followup period. DISCUSSION: Our randomized trial of a promotora-led educational intervention demonstrated improved Pap screening rates, in addition to increased knowledge about cervical cancer and self-efficacy. The observed association between cervical cancer knowledge and Pap smear receipt underscores the importance of educating vulnerable populations about the diseases that disproportionately affect them. Future research should evaluate such programs on a larger scale, and identify novel targets for intervention.
KW - Cervical cancer
KW - Community health worker
KW - Health disparities
KW - Promotora.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=78650111403&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=78650111403&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1007/s11606-010-1434-6
DO - 10.1007/s11606-010-1434-6
M3 - Article
C2 - 20607434
AN - SCOPUS:78650111403
SN - 0884-8734
VL - 25
SP - 1186
EP - 1192
JO - Journal of general internal medicine
JF - Journal of general internal medicine
IS - 11
ER -