TY - JOUR
T1 - Comparative Effectiveness of Second Vasoactive Agents in Septic Shock Refractory to Norepinephrine
AU - Nguyen, H. Bryant
AU - Lu, Samantha
AU - Possagnoli, Isabella
AU - Stokes, Phillip
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© The Author(s) 2016.
PY - 2017/8/1
Y1 - 2017/8/1
N2 - Objective: We aim to identify the appropriate vasoactive agent in patients with septic shock who are refractory to optimal doses of norepinephrine. Methods: In this retrospective observational cohort study over a 4-year period, patients who received norepinephrine within 24 hours of ICU admission and a second agent within 48 hours were enrolled. Results: Among 2640 patients screened, 234 patients were enrolled, aged 60.8 ± 17.8 years, Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation IV 98.3 ± 27.5, 81.6% mechanically ventilated, and 65.8% in-hospital mortality. Within 96 hours, 2.8 ± 1.0 vasoactive agents were administered. Fifty, 50, 66, and 68 patients received dobutamine, dopamine, phenylephrine, and vasopressin as the second agent, with crude in-hospital mortality 40.0%, 66.0%, 74.2%, and 76.5%, respectively, P <.001. Survival analysis showed a statistically significant difference in survival time by second vasoactive agent, P <.001. After adjusting for confounding variables, dobutamine showed significant decreased odds ratio (OR) for mortality compared to vasopressin: OR 0.34 (95% confidence interval 0.14-0.84, P =.04). The relative risk of dying was 55.8% lower in patients receiving dobutamine versus vasopressin, P <.01. Conclusion: Dobutamine is associated with decreased mortality compared to other second vasoactive agents in septic shock when norepinephrine is not sufficient. A prospective randomized trial examining the outcome impact of the second vasoactive agent is needed.
AB - Objective: We aim to identify the appropriate vasoactive agent in patients with septic shock who are refractory to optimal doses of norepinephrine. Methods: In this retrospective observational cohort study over a 4-year period, patients who received norepinephrine within 24 hours of ICU admission and a second agent within 48 hours were enrolled. Results: Among 2640 patients screened, 234 patients were enrolled, aged 60.8 ± 17.8 years, Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation IV 98.3 ± 27.5, 81.6% mechanically ventilated, and 65.8% in-hospital mortality. Within 96 hours, 2.8 ± 1.0 vasoactive agents were administered. Fifty, 50, 66, and 68 patients received dobutamine, dopamine, phenylephrine, and vasopressin as the second agent, with crude in-hospital mortality 40.0%, 66.0%, 74.2%, and 76.5%, respectively, P <.001. Survival analysis showed a statistically significant difference in survival time by second vasoactive agent, P <.001. After adjusting for confounding variables, dobutamine showed significant decreased odds ratio (OR) for mortality compared to vasopressin: OR 0.34 (95% confidence interval 0.14-0.84, P =.04). The relative risk of dying was 55.8% lower in patients receiving dobutamine versus vasopressin, P <.01. Conclusion: Dobutamine is associated with decreased mortality compared to other second vasoactive agents in septic shock when norepinephrine is not sufficient. A prospective randomized trial examining the outcome impact of the second vasoactive agent is needed.
KW - dobutamine
KW - dopamine
KW - norepinephrine
KW - phenylephrine
KW - septic shock
KW - vasoactive agent
KW - vasopressin
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85022041386&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85022041386&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1177/0885066616647941
DO - 10.1177/0885066616647941
M3 - Article
C2 - 27189952
AN - SCOPUS:85022041386
SN - 0885-0666
VL - 32
SP - 451
EP - 459
JO - Journal of Intensive Care Medicine
JF - Journal of Intensive Care Medicine
IS - 7
ER -