Comparative-effectiveness study evaluating outcomes for transforaminal epidural steroid injections performed with 3% hypertonic saline or normal saline in lumbosacral radicular pain

Sithapan Munjupong, Wanwipha Malaithong, Ekasak Chantrapannik, Poomin Ratchano, Nuj Tontisirin, Steven P. Cohen*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Background: Transforaminal epidural steroid injections (TFESI) are commonly employed to treat lumbosacral radiculopathy. Despite anti-inflammatory properties, the addition of 3% hypertonic saline has not been studied. Objective: Compare the effectiveness of adding 0.9% NaCl (N-group) vs. 3% NaCl (H-group) in TFESI performed for lumbosacral radiculopathy. Methods: This retrospective study compared TFESI performed with lidocaine, triamcinolone and 0.9% NaCl vs. lidocaine, triamcinolone and 3% NaCl. The primary outcome was the proportion of patients who experienced a ≥ 30% reduction in pain on a verbal rating scale (VRS; 0-100) at 3 months. Secondary outcome measures included the proportion of patients who improved by at least 30% for pain at 1 and 6 months, and who experienced ≥15% from baseline on the Oswestry disability index (ODI) at follow-up. Results: The H-group experienced more successful pain outcomes than the N-group at 3 months (59.09% vs. 41.51%; P =. 002) but not at 1 month (67.53% vs. 64.78%; P =. 61) or 6 months (27.13% vs 21.55%: P =. 31). For functional outcome, there was a higher proportion of responders in the H-group than the N-group at 3 months (70.31% vs. 53.46%; P =. 002). Female, age ≤ 60 years, and duration of pain ≤ 6 months were associated with superior outcomes at the 3-month endpoint. Although those with a herniated disc experienced better outcomes in general with TFESI, the only difference favoring the H-group was for spondylolisthesis patients. Conclusions: 3% hypertonic saline is a viable alternative to normal saline as an adjunct for TFESI, with randomized studies needed to compare its effectiveness to steroids as a possible alternative.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)451-458
Number of pages8
JournalPain Medicine (United States)
Volume25
Issue number7
DOIs
StatePublished - Jul 1 2024

Funding

This work was partly supported (partial effort for S.P.C.) by the U.S. Dept. of Defense, Uniformed Services University, Department of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation, Musculoskeletal Injury Rehabilitation Research for Operational Readiness (MIRROR) (HU00011920011). This organization played no role in the preparation of this manuscript. The authors thank Mrs. Pimrapat Tengtrakulcharoen for her data analysis and statistical review. This work was partly supported (partial effort for S.P.C.) by the U.S. Dept. of Defense, Uniformed Services University, Department of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation, Musculoskeletal Injury Rehabilitation Research for Operational Readiness (MIRROR) (HU00011920011). This organization played no role in the preparation of this manuscript.

Keywords

  • epidural steroid injection
  • herniated disc
  • hypertonic saline
  • lumbosacral radicular pain
  • postlaminectomy syndrome
  • spinal stenosis
  • spondylolisthesis
  • transforaminal

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • General Medicine

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Comparative-effectiveness study evaluating outcomes for transforaminal epidural steroid injections performed with 3% hypertonic saline or normal saline in lumbosacral radicular pain'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this