TY - JOUR
T1 - Comparing experimental design strategies for quality improvement with minimal changes to factor levels
AU - Mcdaniel, William R.
AU - Ankenman, Bruce E.
PY - 2000/9/1
Y1 - 2000/9/1
N2 - The small factor change problem, an experimental design strategy for the assessment of response improvement, was discussed. The response surface functions were simulated by using a test bed for response surfaces. The small factor change problem was developed as an experimental design problem by assuming different factors of interest and their observed responses. Seven design strategies were compared for simulating the small factor change problem.
AB - The small factor change problem, an experimental design strategy for the assessment of response improvement, was discussed. The response surface functions were simulated by using a test bed for response surfaces. The small factor change problem was developed as an experimental design problem by assuming different factors of interest and their observed responses. Seven design strategies were compared for simulating the small factor change problem.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0034268389&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0034268389&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1002/1099-1638(200009/10)16:5<355::AID-QRE344>3.0.CO;2-I
DO - 10.1002/1099-1638(200009/10)16:5<355::AID-QRE344>3.0.CO;2-I
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:0034268389
SN - 0748-8017
VL - 16
SP - 355
EP - 362
JO - Quality and Reliability Engineering International
JF - Quality and Reliability Engineering International
IS - 5
ER -