Comparing residential mobility programs: Design elements, neighborhood placements, and outcomes in MTO and Gautreaux

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

27 Scopus citations

Abstract

Reviewing prior studies of two residential mobility programs, the Gautreaux and Moving to Opportunity (MTO) programs, this paper examines whether program design elements may explain differences in neighborhood placements, which in turn may explain the programs' different individual outcomes. While MTO has a stronger research design than Gautreaux, it creates more modest changes in environment. Specifically, we find that the two programs create very different kinds of neighborhood placements. Compared with Gautreaux, MTO moves were shorter distances and to census tracts with higher poverty rates, larger minority populations, worse schools, and lower employment rates. These differences in neighborhood placements may explain why Gautreaux found larger impact than MTO in education and employment outcomes and in duration of moves. Although often ignored, design elements may be crucial to the success of programs, and several design elements may explain these different placements.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)27-41
Number of pages15
JournalHousing Policy Debate
Volume20
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 1 2010

Keywords

  • Low-income housing
  • Mobility
  • Poverty or neighborhood

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Development
  • Urban Studies
  • Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Comparing residential mobility programs: Design elements, neighborhood placements, and outcomes in MTO and Gautreaux'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

  • Cite this