TY - JOUR
T1 - Comparison Between S2-Alar-Iliac Screw Fixation and Iliac Screw Fixation in Adult Deformity Surgery
T2 - Reoperation Rates and Spinopelvic Parameters
AU - Ishida, Wataru
AU - Elder, Benjamin D.
AU - Holmes, Christina
AU - Lo, Sheng Fu L.
AU - Goodwin, C. Rory
AU - Kosztowski, Thomas A.
AU - Bydon, Ali
AU - Gokaslan, Ziya L.
AU - Wolinsky, Jean Paul
AU - Sciubba, Daniel M.
AU - Witham, Timothy F.
N1 - Funding Information:
The author(s) declared the following potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article: Author CRG is a UNCF-Merck Postdoctoral Fellow and is supported by an award from the Burroughs Wellcome Fund. Author AB received a research grant from DePuy Synthes Spine and serves on the clinical advisory board of MedImmune, LLC. Author ZLG has stock ownership in US Spine and Spinal Kinetics, consulting, speaking, and teaching agreements for the AO Foundation, and research support from DePuy Synthes, NREF, AOSpine and AO North America. Author DMS received honoraria from Depuy Synthes, and has had consulting agreements with Medtronic, Globus, Stryker, and Orthofix. Author TFW receives research support from the Gordon and Marilyn Macklin Foundation, and has received complementary research medications from Eli Lilly and Company.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2017, © The Author(s) 2017.
PY - 2017/10/1
Y1 - 2017/10/1
N2 - Study Design: Retrospective cohort study. Objective: The S2-alar-iliac (S2AI) technique has been described as an alternative method for pelvic fixation in place of iliac screws (ISs) in spinal deformity surgery. The objective of this study was to analyze the impact of S2AI screws on radiographical outcomes, including spinopelvic parameters. Methods: A retrospective review of 17 patients receiving ISs and 46 patients receiving S2AI screws for correction of adult spinal deformity between 2010 and 2015 with minimum 1-year follow-up was conducted. Patient data on postoperative complications, including reoperation rates and proximal junctional kyphosis (PJK), and radiographical parameters was collected and statistically analyzed. Results: With mean follow-up of 21.1 months, the overall reoperation rate was significantly lower in the S2AI group than in the IS group (21.7% vs 58.8%, P =.01), but the incidence of PJK was similar (32.6% vs 35.3%, P >.99). Moreover, the time to reoperation in the IS group was significantly shorter than in the S2AI group (P =.001), and the S2AI group trended toward a longer time to reoperation due to PJK (P =.08). There was a significantly higher change in pelvic incidence (PI) in the S2AI group (−6.0°) compared with the IS group (P =.001). Conclusions: Compared with the IS technique, the S2AI technique demonstrated a lower rate of overall reoperation, a similar rate of PJK, longer time to reoperation, and possible reduction in PI. Future studies may be warranted to clarify the mechanism of these results and how they can be translated into improved patient care.
AB - Study Design: Retrospective cohort study. Objective: The S2-alar-iliac (S2AI) technique has been described as an alternative method for pelvic fixation in place of iliac screws (ISs) in spinal deformity surgery. The objective of this study was to analyze the impact of S2AI screws on radiographical outcomes, including spinopelvic parameters. Methods: A retrospective review of 17 patients receiving ISs and 46 patients receiving S2AI screws for correction of adult spinal deformity between 2010 and 2015 with minimum 1-year follow-up was conducted. Patient data on postoperative complications, including reoperation rates and proximal junctional kyphosis (PJK), and radiographical parameters was collected and statistically analyzed. Results: With mean follow-up of 21.1 months, the overall reoperation rate was significantly lower in the S2AI group than in the IS group (21.7% vs 58.8%, P =.01), but the incidence of PJK was similar (32.6% vs 35.3%, P >.99). Moreover, the time to reoperation in the IS group was significantly shorter than in the S2AI group (P =.001), and the S2AI group trended toward a longer time to reoperation due to PJK (P =.08). There was a significantly higher change in pelvic incidence (PI) in the S2AI group (−6.0°) compared with the IS group (P =.001). Conclusions: Compared with the IS technique, the S2AI technique demonstrated a lower rate of overall reoperation, a similar rate of PJK, longer time to reoperation, and possible reduction in PI. Future studies may be warranted to clarify the mechanism of these results and how they can be translated into improved patient care.
KW - S2-alar-iliac screw
KW - iliac screw
KW - lumbar lordosis
KW - lumbosacropelvic fixation
KW - pelvic incidence
KW - proximal junctional failure
KW - proximal junctional kyphosis
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85030211545&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85030211545&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1177/2192568217700111
DO - 10.1177/2192568217700111
M3 - Article
C2 - 28989847
AN - SCOPUS:85030211545
SN - 2192-5682
VL - 7
SP - 672
EP - 680
JO - Global Spine Journal
JF - Global Spine Journal
IS - 7
ER -