Comparison of carbon sources in a partial denitrification/anammox MBBR using glycerol, acetate, and methanol

Stephanie Klaus*, Cody Campolong, Alex Rosenthal, Fabrizio Sabba, Matthew Baideme, George Wells, Haydee De Clippeleir, Kartik Chandran, Charles Bott

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

10 Scopus citations

Abstract

Partial denitrification/anammox (PdNA) is an emerging treatment process that can act as a supplement to, or in place of partial nitritation anammox for implementation in mainstream wastewater. A pilot scale PdNA moving bed biofilm reactor (MBBR) was operated at 20 °C. Glycerol, acetate, and methanol were evaluated as external carbon sources. Average PdN efficiency was 88% ± 13 with glycerol, 86% ± 10 with acetate, and 66% ± 11 with methanol. Contrary to previous reports, methanol was not inhibitory to anammox activity. The COD added per TIN removed was 2.41 ± 0.98, 2.02 ± 0.71, and 1.73 ± 0.81 g COD g N−1 for glycerol, acetate, and methanol respectively. During the methanol phase influent nitrite decreased the COD requirement, demonstrating that the polishing MBBR supports both two-stage PNA and single stage PdNA simultaneously. When only considering the PdNA route, methanol still had a comparable COD added/TIN removed ratio to the other two carbon sources (2.33 ± 0.95 g COD g N−1) despite having the lowest PdN efficiency. Appropriate control of influent ammonia to NOx ratio was the limiting factor to reaching low effluent TIN concentrations and maintaining a residual nitrate setpoint via automated carbon dosing control was necessary. Results demonstrate that PdNA is a promising and carbon-efficient technology for nitrogen polishing which can be implemented with a variety of carbon sources, with or without upstream nitrite accumulation.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1041-1052
Number of pages12
JournalEnvironmental Science: Water Research and Technology
Volume9
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Feb 28 2023

Funding

The authors would like to thank Lindsey Ferguson, Kathryn Printz, Kester McCullough, and Sarah Schoepflin for jointly operating the pilot, and Tri Le for feedback and discussions. Hampton Roads Sanitation District funded this work in its entirety.

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Environmental Engineering
  • Water Science and Technology

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Comparison of carbon sources in a partial denitrification/anammox MBBR using glycerol, acetate, and methanol'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this