Comparison of external carbon sources for a polishing partial denitrification/anammox MbbR

Cody Campolong*, Stephanie Klaus, Alex Rosenthal, Fabrizio Sabba, Matthew Baidme, George Wells, Bernhard Wett, Haydee De Clippeleir, Kartik Chandran, Charles Bott

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to conferencePaperpeer-review

2 Scopus citations

Abstract

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to optimize carbon addition to an anoxic partial denitrification/anammox (AMX) MBBR testing three different carbon sources to maximize TIN removal through the AMX pathway and to minimize effluent TIN. Based on data from the pilot, this tertiary treatment step has shown to be a viable nitrogen polishing option.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages56-63
Number of pages8
StatePublished - Jan 1 2019
Event92nd Annual Water Environment Federation's Technical Exhibition and Conference, WEFTEC 2019 - Chicago, United States
Duration: Sep 21 2019Sep 25 2019

Conference

Conference92nd Annual Water Environment Federation's Technical Exhibition and Conference, WEFTEC 2019
CountryUnited States
CityChicago
Period9/21/199/25/19

Keywords

  • Anammox
  • External Carbon Addition
  • MBBR
  • Methanol
  • Partial Denitrification

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Ecological Modeling
  • Environmental Chemistry
  • Water Science and Technology
  • Pollution
  • Waste Management and Disposal

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Comparison of external carbon sources for a polishing partial denitrification/anammox MbbR'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this