TY - JOUR
T1 - Comparison of Improved Unidirectional Dual Velocity-Encoding MRI Methods
AU - Franco, Pamela
AU - Ma, Liliana
AU - Schnell, Susanne
AU - Carrillo, Hugo
AU - Montalba, Cristian
AU - Markl, Michael
AU - Bertoglio, Cristóbal
AU - Uribe, Sergio
N1 - Funding Information:
The authors thank the Biomedical Imaging Center at Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile for their support. This work has been funded by projects PIA-ACT192064, the Millennium Nucleus on Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance NCN17_129, and ICN2021_004 of the Millennium Science Initiative Program of the National Agency for Research and Development, ANID, as well as by the National Heart, Lung and Blood Institute grant F30HL137279. The authors also thank Fondecyt project 1181057 also by ANID. P. Franco thanks ANID—PCHA/Doctorado-Nacional/2018-21180391. H. Carrillo thanks CMM ANID PIA AFB170001 and project CORFO 10CEII-9157 Inria Chile.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2022 International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine.
PY - 2023/3
Y1 - 2023/3
N2 - Background: In phase-contrast (PC) MRI, several dual velocity encoding methods have been proposed to robustly increase velocity-to-noise ratio (VNR), including a standard dual-VENC (SDV), an optimal dual-VENC (ODV), and bi- and triconditional methods. Purpose: To develop a correction method for the ODV approach and to perform a comparison between methods. Study Type: Case–control study. Population: Twenty-six volunteers. Field Strength/Sequence: 1.5 T phase-contrast MRI with VENCs of 50, 75, and 150 cm/second. Assessment: Since we acquired single-VENC protocols, we used the background phase from high-VENC (VENCH) to reconstruct the low-VENC (VENCL) phase. We implemented and compared the unwrapping methods for different noise levels and also developed a correction of the ODV method. Statistical Tests: Shapiro–Wilk's normality test, two-way analysis of variance with homogeneity of variances was performed using Levene's test, and the significance level was adjusted by Tukey's multiple post hoc analysis with Bonferroni (P < 0.05). Results: Statistical analysis revealed no extreme outliers, normally distributed residuals, and homogeneous variances. We found statistically significant interaction between noise levels and the unwrapping methods. This implies that the number of non-unwrapped pixels increased with the noise level. We found that for β = VENCL/VENCH = 1/2, unwrapping methods were more robust to noise. The post hoc test showed a significant difference between the ODV corrected and the other methods, offering the best results regarding the number of unwrapped pixels. Data Conclusions: All methods performed similarly without noise, but the ODV corrected method was more robust to noise at the price of a higher computational time. Level of Evidence: 4. Technical Efficacy Stage: 1.
AB - Background: In phase-contrast (PC) MRI, several dual velocity encoding methods have been proposed to robustly increase velocity-to-noise ratio (VNR), including a standard dual-VENC (SDV), an optimal dual-VENC (ODV), and bi- and triconditional methods. Purpose: To develop a correction method for the ODV approach and to perform a comparison between methods. Study Type: Case–control study. Population: Twenty-six volunteers. Field Strength/Sequence: 1.5 T phase-contrast MRI with VENCs of 50, 75, and 150 cm/second. Assessment: Since we acquired single-VENC protocols, we used the background phase from high-VENC (VENCH) to reconstruct the low-VENC (VENCL) phase. We implemented and compared the unwrapping methods for different noise levels and also developed a correction of the ODV method. Statistical Tests: Shapiro–Wilk's normality test, two-way analysis of variance with homogeneity of variances was performed using Levene's test, and the significance level was adjusted by Tukey's multiple post hoc analysis with Bonferroni (P < 0.05). Results: Statistical analysis revealed no extreme outliers, normally distributed residuals, and homogeneous variances. We found statistically significant interaction between noise levels and the unwrapping methods. This implies that the number of non-unwrapped pixels increased with the noise level. We found that for β = VENCL/VENCH = 1/2, unwrapping methods were more robust to noise. The post hoc test showed a significant difference between the ODV corrected and the other methods, offering the best results regarding the number of unwrapped pixels. Data Conclusions: All methods performed similarly without noise, but the ODV corrected method was more robust to noise at the price of a higher computational time. Level of Evidence: 4. Technical Efficacy Stage: 1.
KW - dual velocity-encoding
KW - phase unwrapping
KW - phase-contrast magnetic resonance
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85132076154&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85132076154&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1002/jmri.28305
DO - 10.1002/jmri.28305
M3 - Article
C2 - 35716109
AN - SCOPUS:85132076154
SN - 1053-1807
VL - 57
SP - 763
EP - 773
JO - Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging
JF - Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging
IS - 3
ER -