Comparison of molecular dynamics simulation methods for the study of grain boundary migration

M. I. Mendelev, C. Deng, C. A. Schuh, D. J. Srolovitz

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

44 Scopus citations

Abstract

In the present study, grain boundary (GB) mobility was determined by molecular dynamics (MD) simulations using two different techniques: the applied strain method and the adapted interface random walk method. The first method involves a driving force while the second method does not. Nevertheless, both methods led to essentially the same values of the GB mobility. This shows that the GB mobility is independent of the nature of the driving force, provided that it is low enough that the linear velocity-driving force relationship is properly sampled. The case studied here can be viewed as a validated reference case that can be used in future studies to test new techniques to determine the GB mobility. For this purpose we provide the full information about the interatomic potential we employed and the initial atomic configurations. Finally, we use the obtained results to discuss whether any existing MD simulation data agree with experimental data on pure metals.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Article number045017
JournalModelling and Simulation in Materials Science and Engineering
Volume21
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 2013
Externally publishedYes

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Modeling and Simulation
  • General Materials Science
  • Condensed Matter Physics
  • Mechanics of Materials
  • Computer Science Applications

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Comparison of molecular dynamics simulation methods for the study of grain boundary migration'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this