TY - JOUR
T1 - Comparison of standardized uptake value-based positron emission tomography and computed tomography target volumes in esophageal cancer patients undergoing radiotherapy
AU - Vali, Faisal S.
AU - Nagda, Suneel
AU - Hall, William
AU - Sinacore, James
AU - Gao, Mingcheng
AU - Lee, Steven H.
AU - Hong, Robert
AU - Shoup, Margaret
AU - Emami, Bahman
PY - 2010/11/4
Y1 - 2010/11/4
N2 - Purpose: To study various standardized uptake value (SUV)-based approaches to ascertain the best strategy for delineating metabolic tumor volumes (MTV). Methods and Materials: Twenty-two consecutive previously treated esophageal cancer patients with positron emission tomography (PET) imaging and computed tomography (CT)-based radiotherapy plans were studied. At the level of the tumor epicenter, MTVs were delineated at 11 different thresholds: SUV ≥2, ≥2.5, ≥3, ≥3.5 (SUVn); ≥40%, ≥45%, and ≥50% of the maximum (SUVn%); and mean liver SUV + 1, 2, 3, and 4 standard deviations (SUVLnσ). The volume ratio and conformality index were determined between MTVs, and the corresponding CT/endoscopic ultrasound-based gross tumor volume (GTV) at the epicenter. Means were analyzed by one-way analysis of variance for repeated measures and further compared using a paired t test for repeated measures. Results: The mean conformality indices ranged from 0.33 to 0.48, being significantly (p < 0.05) closest to 1 at SUV 2.5 (0.47 ± 0.03) and SUVL4σ (0.48 ± 0.03). The mean volume ratios ranged from 0.39 to 2.82, being significantly closest to 1 at SUV2.5 (1.18 ± 0.36) and SUV L4σ (1.09 ± 0.15). The mean value of the SUVs calculated using the SUVL4σ approach was 2.4. Conclusions: Regardless of the SUV thresholding method used (i.e., absolute or relative to liver mean), a threshold of approximately 2.5 yields the highest conformality index and best approximates the CT-based GTV at the epicenter. These findings may ultimately aid radiation oncologists in the delineation of the entire GTV in esophageal cancer patients.
AB - Purpose: To study various standardized uptake value (SUV)-based approaches to ascertain the best strategy for delineating metabolic tumor volumes (MTV). Methods and Materials: Twenty-two consecutive previously treated esophageal cancer patients with positron emission tomography (PET) imaging and computed tomography (CT)-based radiotherapy plans were studied. At the level of the tumor epicenter, MTVs were delineated at 11 different thresholds: SUV ≥2, ≥2.5, ≥3, ≥3.5 (SUVn); ≥40%, ≥45%, and ≥50% of the maximum (SUVn%); and mean liver SUV + 1, 2, 3, and 4 standard deviations (SUVLnσ). The volume ratio and conformality index were determined between MTVs, and the corresponding CT/endoscopic ultrasound-based gross tumor volume (GTV) at the epicenter. Means were analyzed by one-way analysis of variance for repeated measures and further compared using a paired t test for repeated measures. Results: The mean conformality indices ranged from 0.33 to 0.48, being significantly (p < 0.05) closest to 1 at SUV 2.5 (0.47 ± 0.03) and SUVL4σ (0.48 ± 0.03). The mean volume ratios ranged from 0.39 to 2.82, being significantly closest to 1 at SUV2.5 (1.18 ± 0.36) and SUV L4σ (1.09 ± 0.15). The mean value of the SUVs calculated using the SUVL4σ approach was 2.4. Conclusions: Regardless of the SUV thresholding method used (i.e., absolute or relative to liver mean), a threshold of approximately 2.5 yields the highest conformality index and best approximates the CT-based GTV at the epicenter. These findings may ultimately aid radiation oncologists in the delineation of the entire GTV in esophageal cancer patients.
KW - Esophageal cancer
KW - Positron emission tomography
KW - Radiotherapy planning
KW - Standardized uptake value
KW - Target volume
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=77958495819&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=77958495819&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2009.09.022
DO - 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2009.09.022
M3 - Article
C2 - 20199850
AN - SCOPUS:77958495819
SN - 0360-3016
VL - 78
SP - 1057
EP - 1063
JO - International Journal of Radiation Oncology Biology Physics
JF - International Journal of Radiation Oncology Biology Physics
IS - 4
ER -