TY - JOUR
T1 - Comparison of usual podiatric care and early physical therapy intervention for plantar heel pain
T2 - Study protocol for a parallel-group randomized clinical trial
AU - McClinton, Shane M.
AU - Flynn, Timothy W.
AU - Heiderscheit, Bryan C.
AU - McPoil, Thomas G.
AU - Pinto, Daniel
AU - Duffy, Pamela A.
AU - Bennett, John D.
N1 - Funding Information:
This study has received peer-review and is funded in part by the Orthopaedic Section, APTA, Inc. The Institutional Review Boards (IRB) at Des Moines University (IRB identification 04-12-03) and Rocky Mountain University of Health Professions (IRB identification 131034–02) have approved this study. The study is sponsored by Des Moines University.
PY - 2013/12/3
Y1 - 2013/12/3
N2 - Background: A significant number of individuals suffer from plantar heel pain (PHP) and many go on to have chronic symptoms and continued disability. Persistence of symptoms adds to the economic burden of PHP and cost-effective solutions are needed. Currently, there is a wide variation in treatment, cost, and outcomes of care for PHP with limited information on the cost-effectiveness and comparisons of common treatment approaches. Two practice guidelines and recent evidence of effective physical therapy intervention are available to direct treatment but the timing and influence of physical therapy intervention in the multidisciplinary management of PHP is unclear. The purpose of this investigation is to compare the outcomes and costs associated with early physical therapy intervention (ePT) following initial presentation to podiatry versus usual podiatric care (uPOD) in individuals with PHP.Methods: A parallel-group, block-randomized clinical trial will compare ePT and uPOD. Both groups will be seen initially by a podiatrist before allocation to a group that will receive physical therapy intervention consisting primarily of manual therapy, exercise, and modalities, or podiatric care consisting primarily of a stretching handout, medication, injections, and orthotics. Treatment in each group will be directed by practice guidelines and a procedural manual, yet the specific intervention for each participant will be selected by the treating provider. Between-group differences in the Foot and Ankle Ability Measure 6 months following the initial visit will be the primary outcome collected by an independent investigator. In addition, differences in the European Quality of Life - Five Dimensions, Numeric Pain Rating Scale, Global Rating of Change (GROC), health-related costs, and cost-effectiveness at 6 weeks, 6 months, and 1 year will be compared between groups. The association between successful outcomes based on GROC score and participant expectations of recovery generally, and specific to physical therapy and podiatry treatment, will also be analyzed.Discussion: This study will be the first pragmatic trial to investigate the clinical outcomes and cost-effectiveness of ePT and uPOD in individuals with PHP. The results will serve to inform clinical practice decisions and management guidelines of multiple disciplines.Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT01865734.
AB - Background: A significant number of individuals suffer from plantar heel pain (PHP) and many go on to have chronic symptoms and continued disability. Persistence of symptoms adds to the economic burden of PHP and cost-effective solutions are needed. Currently, there is a wide variation in treatment, cost, and outcomes of care for PHP with limited information on the cost-effectiveness and comparisons of common treatment approaches. Two practice guidelines and recent evidence of effective physical therapy intervention are available to direct treatment but the timing and influence of physical therapy intervention in the multidisciplinary management of PHP is unclear. The purpose of this investigation is to compare the outcomes and costs associated with early physical therapy intervention (ePT) following initial presentation to podiatry versus usual podiatric care (uPOD) in individuals with PHP.Methods: A parallel-group, block-randomized clinical trial will compare ePT and uPOD. Both groups will be seen initially by a podiatrist before allocation to a group that will receive physical therapy intervention consisting primarily of manual therapy, exercise, and modalities, or podiatric care consisting primarily of a stretching handout, medication, injections, and orthotics. Treatment in each group will be directed by practice guidelines and a procedural manual, yet the specific intervention for each participant will be selected by the treating provider. Between-group differences in the Foot and Ankle Ability Measure 6 months following the initial visit will be the primary outcome collected by an independent investigator. In addition, differences in the European Quality of Life - Five Dimensions, Numeric Pain Rating Scale, Global Rating of Change (GROC), health-related costs, and cost-effectiveness at 6 weeks, 6 months, and 1 year will be compared between groups. The association between successful outcomes based on GROC score and participant expectations of recovery generally, and specific to physical therapy and podiatry treatment, will also be analyzed.Discussion: This study will be the first pragmatic trial to investigate the clinical outcomes and cost-effectiveness of ePT and uPOD in individuals with PHP. The results will serve to inform clinical practice decisions and management guidelines of multiple disciplines.Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT01865734.
KW - Cost
KW - Exercise therapy
KW - Musculoskeletal manipulations
KW - Plantar fasciitis
KW - Podiatry
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84888781996&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84888781996&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1186/1745-6215-14-414
DO - 10.1186/1745-6215-14-414
M3 - Article
C2 - 24299257
AN - SCOPUS:84888781996
SN - 1745-6215
VL - 14
JO - Trials
JF - Trials
IS - 1
M1 - 414
ER -