TY - JOUR
T1 - Compliant lower limb exoskeletons
T2 - A comprehensive review on mechanical design principles
AU - Sanchez-Villamañan, Maria Del Carmen
AU - Gonzalez-Vargas, Jose
AU - Torricelli, Diego
AU - Moreno, Juan C.
AU - Pons, Jose L
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2019 The Author(s).
PY - 2019/5/9
Y1 - 2019/5/9
N2 - Exoskeleton technology has made significant advances during the last decade, resulting in a considerable variety of solutions for gait assistance and rehabilitation. The mechanical design of these devices is a crucial aspect that affects the efficiency and effectiveness of their interaction with the user. Recent developments have pointed towards compliant mechanisms and structures, due to their promising potential in terms of adaptability, safety, efficiency, and comfort. However, there still remain challenges to be solved before compliant lower limb exoskeletons can be deployed in real scenarios. In this review, we analysed 52 lower limb wearable exoskeletons, focusing on three main aspects of compliance: actuation, structure, and interface attachment components. We highlighted the drawbacks and advantages of the different solutions, and suggested a number of promising research lines. We also created and made available a set of data sheets that contain the technical characteristics of the reviewed devices, with the aim of providing researchers and end-users with an updated overview on the existing solutions.
AB - Exoskeleton technology has made significant advances during the last decade, resulting in a considerable variety of solutions for gait assistance and rehabilitation. The mechanical design of these devices is a crucial aspect that affects the efficiency and effectiveness of their interaction with the user. Recent developments have pointed towards compliant mechanisms and structures, due to their promising potential in terms of adaptability, safety, efficiency, and comfort. However, there still remain challenges to be solved before compliant lower limb exoskeletons can be deployed in real scenarios. In this review, we analysed 52 lower limb wearable exoskeletons, focusing on three main aspects of compliance: actuation, structure, and interface attachment components. We highlighted the drawbacks and advantages of the different solutions, and suggested a number of promising research lines. We also created and made available a set of data sheets that contain the technical characteristics of the reviewed devices, with the aim of providing researchers and end-users with an updated overview on the existing solutions.
KW - Assistance
KW - Compliant actuation
KW - Lower limb exoskeleton
KW - Mechanical compliance
KW - Mechanical design
KW - Rehabilitation
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85065464309&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85065464309&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1186/s12984-019-0517-9
DO - 10.1186/s12984-019-0517-9
M3 - Review article
C2 - 31072370
AN - SCOPUS:85065464309
SN - 1743-0003
VL - 16
JO - Journal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation
JF - Journal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation
IS - 1
M1 - 55
ER -