Compounded topical pain creams to treat localized chronic pain: A randomized controlled trial

Robert E. Brutcher, Connie Kurihara, Mark C. Bicket, Parvaneh Moussavian-Yousefi, David E. Reece, Lisa M. Solomon, Scott R. Griffith, David E. Jamison, Steven P. Cohen*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

21 Scopus citations

Abstract

Background: The use of compounded topical pain creams has increased dramatically, yet their effectiveness has not been well evaluated. Objective: To determine the efficacy of compounded creams for chronic pain. Design: Randomized controlled trials of 3 interventions. (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT02497066) Setting: Military treatment facility. Participants: 399 patients with localized pain classified by each patient's treating physician as neuropathic (n = 133), nociceptive (n = 133), or mixed (n = 133). Intervention: Pain creams compounded for neuropathic pain (ketamine, gabapentin, clonidine, and lidocaine), nociceptive pain (ketoprofen, baclofen, cyclobenzaprine, and lidocaine), or mixed pain (ketamine, gabapentin, diclofenac, baclofen, cyclobenzaprine, and lidocaine), or placebo. Measurements: The primary outcome measure was average pain score 1 month after treatment. A positive categorical response was a reduction in pain score of 2 or more points coupled with a score above 3 on a 5-point satisfaction scale. Secondary outcomes included Short Form-36 Health Survey scores, satisfaction, and categorical response. Participants with a positive outcome were followed through 3 months. Results: For the primary outcome, no differences were found in the mean reduction in average pain scores between the treatment and control groups for patients with neuropathic pain (-0.1 points [95% CI,-0.8 to 0.5 points]), nociceptive pain (-0.3 points [CI, -0.9 to 0.2 points]), or mixed pain (-0.3 points [CI, -0.9 to 0.2 points]), or for all patients (-0.3 points [CI, -0.6 to 0.1 points]). At 1 month, 72 participants (36%) in the treatment groups and 54 (28%) in the control group had a positive outcome (risk difference, 8% [CI, -1% to 17%]). Limitations: Generalizability is limited by heterogeneity among pain conditions and formulations of the study interventions. Randomized follow-up was only 1 month. Conclusion: Compounded pain creams were not better than placebo creams, and their higher costs compared with approved compounds should curtail routine use. Primary Funding Source: Centers for Rehabilitation Sciences Research, Defense Health Agency, U.S. Department of Defense.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)309-318
Number of pages10
JournalAnnals of internal medicine
Volume170
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - 2019

Funding

Disclosures: Dr. Bicket reports grants from Foundation for Anesthesia Education and Research during the conduct of the study and personal fees from Axial Healthcare outside the submitted work. Dr. Cohen reports personal fees from Sem-nur; grants from SPR Therapeutics; grants and personal fees

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Internal Medicine

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Compounded topical pain creams to treat localized chronic pain: A randomized controlled trial'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this