TY - JOUR
T1 - Computation-guided optimization of split protein systems
AU - Dolberg, Taylor B.
AU - Meger, Anthony T.
AU - Boucher, Jonathan D.
AU - Corcoran, William K.
AU - Schauer, Elizabeth E.
AU - Prybutok, Alexis N.
AU - Raman, Srivatsan
AU - Leonard, Joshua N.
N1 - Funding Information:
This work was supported in part by the National Institute of Biomedical Imaging and Bioengineering of the NIH under award no. 1R01EB026510 (J.N.L.) and the Northwestern University Flow Cytometry Core Facility supported by a Cancer Center Support Grant (NCI 5P30CA060553). T.B.D was supported by the Department of Defense (DoD) through the National Defense Science & Engineering Graduate Fellowship (NDSEG). J.D.B. and A.N.P. were supported by the National Science Foundation through Graduate Research Fellowships. J.D.B. and W.K.C. were supported in part by the National Institutes of Health Training Grant (T32GM008449) through Northwestern University’s Biotechnology Training Program. This work is also supported in part by the Great Lakes Bioenergy Research Center, US Department of Energy, Office of Science, Office of Biological and Environmental Research, under award no. DE-SC0018409 (S.R. and A.T.M.). The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the NIH, Department of Defense, Department of Energy or other federal agencies.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2021, The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature America, Inc.
PY - 2021/5
Y1 - 2021/5
N2 - Splitting bioactive proteins into conditionally reconstituting fragments is a powerful strategy for building tools to study and control biological systems. However, split proteins often exhibit a high propensity to reconstitute, even without the conditional trigger, limiting their utility. Current approaches for tuning reconstitution propensity are laborious, context-specific or often ineffective. Here, we report a computational design strategy grounded in fundamental protein biophysics to guide experimental evaluation of a sparse set of mutants to identify an optimal functional window. We hypothesized that testing a limited set of mutants would direct subsequent mutagenesis efforts by predicting desirable mutant combinations from a vast mutational landscape. This strategy varies the degree of interfacial destabilization while preserving stability and catalytic activity. We validate our method by solving two distinct split protein design challenges, generating both design and mechanistic insights. This new technology will streamline the generation and use of split protein systems for diverse applications. [Figure not available: see fulltext.]
AB - Splitting bioactive proteins into conditionally reconstituting fragments is a powerful strategy for building tools to study and control biological systems. However, split proteins often exhibit a high propensity to reconstitute, even without the conditional trigger, limiting their utility. Current approaches for tuning reconstitution propensity are laborious, context-specific or often ineffective. Here, we report a computational design strategy grounded in fundamental protein biophysics to guide experimental evaluation of a sparse set of mutants to identify an optimal functional window. We hypothesized that testing a limited set of mutants would direct subsequent mutagenesis efforts by predicting desirable mutant combinations from a vast mutational landscape. This strategy varies the degree of interfacial destabilization while preserving stability and catalytic activity. We validate our method by solving two distinct split protein design challenges, generating both design and mechanistic insights. This new technology will streamline the generation and use of split protein systems for diverse applications. [Figure not available: see fulltext.]
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85100293188&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85100293188&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1038/s41589-020-00729-8
DO - 10.1038/s41589-020-00729-8
M3 - Article
C2 - 33526893
AN - SCOPUS:85100293188
SN - 1552-4450
VL - 17
SP - 531
EP - 539
JO - Nature Chemical Biology
JF - Nature Chemical Biology
IS - 5
ER -