TY - JOUR
T1 - Computational Discovery of Li-M-O Ion Exchange Materials for Lithium Extraction from Brines
AU - Snydacker, David H.
AU - Hegde, Vinay I.
AU - Aykol, Muratahan
AU - Wolverton, C.
N1 - Funding Information:
The authors are grateful to Kimberly Gray and Kevin Schwartzenberg for helpful discussions and preliminary experiments. D.S. acknowledges support from the Center for Electrochemical Energy Science (CEES), an Energy Frontier Research Center (EFRC) funded by the U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Science, Office of Basic Energy Sciences (Award No. DE-AC02-06CH11357). M.A. and C.W. were supported by The Dow Chemical Company. V.H. was supported by the National Science Foundation as part of Collaborative Research: Computational Thermochemistry of Compounds (Project DMR-1309957). D.S. acknowledges fellowship support from Northwestern’s Hierarchical Materials Cluster Program and from the Institute for Sustainability and Energy at Northwestern (ISEN). This research used resources of the National Energy Research Scientific Computing Center, which is supported by the Office of Science of the U.S. Department of Energy under Contract No. DE-AC02-05CH11231 as well as the Northwestern University Quest computing resources.
Publisher Copyright:
Copyright © 2018 American Chemical Society.
PY - 2018/10/23
Y1 - 2018/10/23
N2 - Lithium is an essential element for today's high-performance batteries. Brine resources contain most of the world's lithium reserves, but conventional processes for extracting lithium from brines are limited by low lithium recovery and large evaporation ponds. Lithium ion exchange is an alternative extraction method with potential to access lower-quality resources and decrease costs. Ion exchange materials absorb lithium from brine resources and then release the lithium in acid while absorbing hydrogen. New ion exchange materials are sought to facilitate this transformative approach. We use high-throughput density functional theory and specific ion interaction theory to predict promising new lithium metal oxide compounds suitable for lithium extraction. Starting from the Open Quantum Materials Database (OQMD) of ∼400,000 compounds, we consider 77 candidate lithium metal oxide compounds that are stable or nearly stable in their lithiated states. We interrogate this list for compounds that thermodynamically release lithium while binding hydrogen in acid and that also release hydrogen while binding lithium in brine. We further screen for selective binding of lithium relative to sodium in brine. We find that most candidate compounds either bind lithium in both acid and brine solutions or bind hydrogen in both acid and brine solutions. Such compounds are not suitable for lithium ion exchange. However, we identify nine compounds that are most promising for lithium extraction from brines: LiAlO2, LiCuO2, Li2MnO3, Li4Mn5O12, Li2SnO3, Li4TiO4, Li4Ti5O12, Li7Ti11O24, and Li3VO4. Four additional compounds are promising when the pH of the brine is adjusted to 10 to help drive hydrogen release: Li2TiO3, LiTiO2, Li2FeO3, and Li2Si3O7. Four of the previously mentioned compounds are also promising for Li extraction from seawater: Li2MnO3, Li4Mn5O12, Li7Ti11O24, and Li3VO4.
AB - Lithium is an essential element for today's high-performance batteries. Brine resources contain most of the world's lithium reserves, but conventional processes for extracting lithium from brines are limited by low lithium recovery and large evaporation ponds. Lithium ion exchange is an alternative extraction method with potential to access lower-quality resources and decrease costs. Ion exchange materials absorb lithium from brine resources and then release the lithium in acid while absorbing hydrogen. New ion exchange materials are sought to facilitate this transformative approach. We use high-throughput density functional theory and specific ion interaction theory to predict promising new lithium metal oxide compounds suitable for lithium extraction. Starting from the Open Quantum Materials Database (OQMD) of ∼400,000 compounds, we consider 77 candidate lithium metal oxide compounds that are stable or nearly stable in their lithiated states. We interrogate this list for compounds that thermodynamically release lithium while binding hydrogen in acid and that also release hydrogen while binding lithium in brine. We further screen for selective binding of lithium relative to sodium in brine. We find that most candidate compounds either bind lithium in both acid and brine solutions or bind hydrogen in both acid and brine solutions. Such compounds are not suitable for lithium ion exchange. However, we identify nine compounds that are most promising for lithium extraction from brines: LiAlO2, LiCuO2, Li2MnO3, Li4Mn5O12, Li2SnO3, Li4TiO4, Li4Ti5O12, Li7Ti11O24, and Li3VO4. Four additional compounds are promising when the pH of the brine is adjusted to 10 to help drive hydrogen release: Li2TiO3, LiTiO2, Li2FeO3, and Li2Si3O7. Four of the previously mentioned compounds are also promising for Li extraction from seawater: Li2MnO3, Li4Mn5O12, Li7Ti11O24, and Li3VO4.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85054971208&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85054971208&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1021/acs.chemmater.7b03509
DO - 10.1021/acs.chemmater.7b03509
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85054971208
SN - 0897-4756
VL - 30
SP - 6961
EP - 6968
JO - Chemistry of Materials
JF - Chemistry of Materials
IS - 20
ER -